Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465166›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2014

Prolyl endopeptidase activity is correlated with colorectal cancer prognosis.

Gorka Larrinaga, Itxaro Perez, Lorena Blanco, Begoña Sanz, Peio Errarte, Maider Beitia, María C Etxezarraga, Alberto Loizate, Javier Gil, Jon Irazusta and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gorka Larrinaga1. Department of Nursing I, School of Nursing, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 2. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 6. BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Itxaro Perez1. Department of Nursing I, School of Nursing, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 2. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 6. BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Lorena Blanco2. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 6. BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Begoña Sanz2. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 6. BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Peio Errarte2. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 6. BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Maider Beitia2. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 6. BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
María C Etxezarraga3. Department of Anatomic Pathology, Basurto University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 6. BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Alberto Loizate4. Department of Surgery, Basurto University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 6. BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Javier Gil2. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 6. BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Jon Irazusta2. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 6. BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
José I López5. Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain; ; 6. BioCruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
University of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveProlyl endopeptidase (PEP) (EC 3.4.21.26) is a serine peptidase involved in differentiation, development and proliferation processes of several tissues. Recent studies have demonstrated the increased expression and activity of this cytosolic enzyme in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there are no available data about the impact of this peptidase in the biological aggressiveness of this tumor in patient survival.

methodsThe activity of PEP in tissue (n=80) and plasma (n=40) of patients with CRC was prospectively analyzed by fluorimetric methods. Results were correlated with the most important classic pathological data related to aggressiveness, with 5-year survival rates and other clinical variables.

results1) PEP is more active in early phases of CRC; 2) Lower levels of the enzyme in tumors were located in the rectum and this decrease could be related with preoperative chemo-radiotherapy; 3) PEP activity in tissue was higher in patients with better overall and disease-free survival (log-rank p<0.01, Cox analysis p<0.01); 4) Plasmatic PEP activity was significantly higher in CRC patients than in healthy individuals and this was associated with distant metastases and with worse overall and disease-free survivals (log-rank p<0.05, Cox analysis p<0.05).

conclusionsPEP activity in tissue and plasma from CRC patients is an independent prognostic factor in survival. The determination of PEP activity in the plasma may be a safe, minimally invasive and inexpensive way to define the aggressiveness of CRC in daily practice.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsPrognosisAgedBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProlyl OligopeptidasesSerine EndopeptidasesBiomarkers, TumorPREPL protein, humanProlyl OligopeptidasesSerine Endopeptidasescolorectal cancerPEPprognosisProlyl endopeptidasesurvival.

Identifiers

PMID24465166
PMCPMC3894405
OpenAlexW2079023773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.