Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24465046›Full record

ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2013

Comparison of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with sufentanil, fentanyl, or placebo for elective caesarean section: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study.

Nesrin Bozdogan Ozyilkan, Aysu Kocum, Mesut Sener, Esra Caliskan, Ebru Tarim, Pinar Ergenoglu, Anis Aribogan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01858090 (Comparison of Intrathecal Levobupivacaine Combined With Sufentanil, Fentanyl, or Placebo for Elective Caesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01858090 phase3completednot on this map

Comparison of Intrathecal Levobupivacaine Combined With Sufentanil, Fentanyl, or Placebo for Elective Caesarean Section: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBaskent UniversityRan2009 to 2010Enrolled93ConditionsElective Caesarean Section SurgeriesArmsControl Group Chirocaine, Group Fentanyl, Group sufentanil, Ephedrine, Atropine sulfate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Post-caesarean analgesia: What is new?Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nesrin Bozdogan OzyilkanAnesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Baskent University School of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
Aysu KocumAnesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Baskent University School of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
Mesut SenerAnesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Baskent University School of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
Esra CaliskanAnesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Baskent University School of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
Ebru TarimDepartment of Gyneocology and Obstetrics, Baskent University School of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
Pinar ErgenogluAnesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Baskent University School of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
Anis AriboganAnesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Baskent University School of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
Başkent University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe addition of opioids to local anesthetics contributes to the quality of spinal anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.

objectiveIn our prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study, our aim was to compare the effect of low-dose sufentanil plus levobupivacaine or a fentanyl plus levobupivacaine mixture on anesthesia quality, block characteristics, newborn and mother well-being, surgeon satisfaction, and duration of postoperative analgesia.

methodsNinety-three patients were randomized into 3 groups (n = 31). Patients in Group C received 0.5% levobupivacaine (2.2 ± 0.2 mL), Group S received 2.5 µg sufentanil plus 0.5% levobupivacaine (2.2 ± 0.2 mL), and Group F received 10 µg fentanyl plus 0.5% levobupivacaine (2.2 ± 0.2 mL) intrathecally completed to a volume of 3 mL with the addition of saline in all groups. Patients' demographics, sensory and motor block characteristics, hemodynamics, Apgar scores, umbilical blood gas values, maternal side effects, surgeon satisfaction score, time to first analgesia requirement, and additional analgesic use within 24 hours were recorded.

resultsIn Group S and Group F, target levels of sensory and motor block were achieved more rapidly (P < 0.001). The hemodynamic values were lower (P < 0.05), and the duration of sensory blockade and the time of first analgesic requirement were longer (P < 0.001) in Group S. Additional analgesic requirement during first 24-hour period was lowest in Group S, and highest in Group C (P < 0.001). Apgar scores and umbilical blood gas samples were similar between groups. Postoperative pruritus was more frequent in Group S (P < 0.001) and surgeon satisfaction score was significantly lower in Group C (P = 0.003).

conclusionsWe suggest that the addition of sufentanil and fentanyl to intrathecal levobupivacaine during caesarean section surgery is more effective than the administration of levobupivacaine alone. The addition of sufentanil to levobupivacaine allowed rapid onset time for sensory and motor block levels. It also extended the duration of postoperative analgesia and led to a decrease in total analgesic requirement. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01858090.

Indexed as

caesarean sectionfentanyllevobupivacainelocal anestheticsspinal anesthesiasufentanil

Identifiers

PMID24465046
PMCPMC3898189
OpenAlexW2009301074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.