Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24464926›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

The prognosis and clinicopathology of CXCR4 in gastric cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Mingzhi Han, Shunzeng Lv, Ya Zhang, Ruiyang Yi, Bin Huang, Hanhui Fu, Ruixiang Bian, Xingang Li

RetractedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisRetracted Publication
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. CXCR4-expressingOncotarget · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression and lung cancer prognosis: a meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  13. Expression of CXCR4 and non-small cell lung cancer prognosis: a meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  14. CXCR4 in breast cancer: oncogenic role and therapeutic targeting.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. The intricate role of CXCR4 in cancer.Advances in cancer research · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mingzhi HanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University and Brain Science Research Institute, Shandong University, NO.44 West Wenhua Road, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Shunzeng Lv
Ya Zhang
Ruiyang Yi
Bin Huang
Hanhui Fu
Ruixiang Bian
Xingang Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) has been widely investigated in diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer (GC). However, the impact of CXCR4 on GC patients remains controversial; Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to obtain the precise role of CXCR4 in GC prognosis and clinicopathology. Thirteen published studies with a total of 1,936 patients were included. Original data included the hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and odds ratio (OR) in GC patients. We combined HR/OR with 95% confidence interval (CI) to estimate the hazard. In this study, OS was significantly related to CXCR4 expression, with the HR 2.63 (95% CI 1.69-4.09; p < 0.0001), and a significant correlation was also revealed between CXCR4 expression and stage (I + II, +) (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.83; p = 0.007), depth of invasion (T1/T2, +) (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27-0.73; p = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (LN, +) (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.57-3.36; p < 0.0001), as well as vascular invasion (vas.inv, +) (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.98; p = 0.04). Heterogeneity was observed among the included studies with OS (I(2) = 51%), stage (I(2) = 78%), depth of invasion (I(2) = 74%), lymph node metastasis (I(2) = 64%), and histology differentiation (I(2) = 79%). No publication bias was observed. In conclusion, this meta-analysis showed CXCR4 expression indicates poor prognosis in GC patients with advanced stage or deep invasion in GC tissues, which also implied lymph node metastasis and vascular invasion. Thus, CXCR4 could help predict patient prognosis and guide clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm StagingPrognosisPublication BiasReceptors, CXCR4Stomach NeoplasmsCXCR4 protein, humanReceptors, CXCR4

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.