SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
GH1 T1663A polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting growth hormone function: strategies and therapeutic applications.Signal transduction and targeted therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many studies have demonstrated that the most common polymorphism (T1663A, rs2665802) in the promoter region of growth hormone 1 (GH1) gene might play an important role in cancer development and progression. This meta-analysis aims to investigate a more precise estimation of the relationship between GH1 T1663A polymorphism and cancer risk. We searched CISCOM, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, and CBM databases from inception through October 1st, 2013. Meta-analysis was performed using the STATA 12.0 software. Seven studies were included with a total of 4,018 cancer patients and 5,308 healthy controls. Our meta-analysis results revealed that GH1 T1663A polymorphism was associated with increased cancer risks. Subgroup analysis by cancer type showed significant associations between GH1 T1663A polymorphism and increased colorectal cancer risk, but there was no evidence of any association with breast cancer. Further subgroup analysis based on ethnicity indicated that GH1 T1663A polymorphism might increase cancer risks among Asian populations. However, no statistically significant association was found among Caucasian populations. Meta-regression analyses also suggested that cancer type and ethnicity may be the main sources of heterogeneity. No publication bias was detected in this meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis indicates that GH1 T1663A polymorphism may contribute to the risk of colorectal cancer, especially among Asian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.