ArticleDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals2014
The effect of ABCG2 and ABCC4 on the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in the brain.
Article in Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does mifamurtide affect the elimination of high-dose methotrexate in children with osteosarcoma?Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- The Extension of the LeiCNS-PK3.0 Model in Combination with the "Handshake" Approach to Understand Brain Tumor Pathophysiology.Pharmaceutical research · 2022Article
- Factors Influencing Luciferase-Based Bioluminescent Imaging in Preclinical Models of Brain Tumor.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2022Article
- The Daily Expression of ABCC4 at the BCSFB Affects the Transport of Its Substrate Methotrexate.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- A comprehensive review in improving delivery of small-molecule chemotherapeutic agents overcoming the blood-brain/brain tumor barriers for glioblastoma treatment.Drug delivery · 2019Review
- Is the blood-brain barrier really disrupted in all glioblastomas? A critical assessment of existing clinical data.Neuro-oncology · 2018Review
- Disease-Induced Alterations in Brain Drug Transporters in Animal Models of Alzheimer's Disease : Theme: Drug Discovery, Development and Delivery in Alzheimer's Disease Guest Editor: Davide Brambilla.Pharmaceutical research · 2017Article
- Investigation of the Importance of Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 4 (Mrp4/Abcc4) in the Active Efflux of Anionic Drugs Across the Blood-Brain Barrier.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2017Article
- A Review on Microdialysis Calibration Methods: the Theory and Current Related Efforts.Molecular neurobiology · 2017Review
- New approaches in primary central nervous system lymphoma.Chinese clinical oncology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of chemotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma, yet how the blood-brain barrier (BBB) efflux transporters ABCG2 and ABCC4 influence the required high-dose therapy is unknown. To evaluate their role, we used four mouse strains, C57BL/6 (wild-type; WT), Abcg2(-/-), Abcc4(-/-), and Abcg2(-/-);Abcc4(-/-) (double knockout; DKO) to conduct brain microdialysis studies after single intravenous MTX doses of 50 mg/kg. When the area under the concentration-time curve for plasma (AUC(plasma)) was used to assess systemic exposure to MTX, the rank order was Abcc4(-/-) < WT < Abcg2(-/-) < Abcg2(-/-)Abcc4(-/-). Only the DKO exposure was significantly higher than that of the WT group (P < 0.01), a reflection of the role of Abcg2 in biliary excretion and Abcc4 in renal excretion. MTX brain interstitial fluid concentrations obtained by microdialysis were used to calculate the area under the concentration-time curve for the brain (AUC(brain)), which found the rank order of exposure to be WT < Abcc4(-/-) < Abcg2(-/-) < Abcg2(-/-)Abcc4(-/-) with the largest difference being 4-fold: 286.13 ± 130 μg*min/ml (DKO) versus 66.85 ± 26 (WT). Because the transporters affected the systemic disposition of MTX, particularly in the DKO group, the ratio of the AUC(brain)/AUC(plasma) or the brain/plasma partition coefficient Kp was calculated, revealing that the DKO strain had a significantly higher value (0.23 ± 0.09) than the WT strain (0.11 ± 0.05). Both Abcg2 and Abcc4 limited BBB penetration of MTX; however, only when both drug efflux pumps were negated did the brain accumulation of MTX significantly increase. These findings indicate a contributory role of both ABCG2 and ABCC4 to limiting MTX distribution in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.