ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2014
Cardiac PET-CT for monitoring medical and interventional therapy in patients with CAD: PET alone versus hybrid PET-CT?
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Imaging and Heart Failure: Where are we Heading?Cardiac failure review · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review focuses on optimal use of PET and PET-CT in monitoring medical and interventional therapy in patients with CAD. PET provides quantitative measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow and thus permits comprehensive physiological assessment of the coronary circulation. Hybrid PET-CT, in particular CCTA, adds anatomical information to maximal MBF measurement and so facilitates distinction of triple vessel focal epicardial disease from coronary microvascular disease or diffuse coronary atherosclerosis without focal stenoses. Hybrid PET-CT also may be of value in determining appropriateness and feasibility of percutaneous interventional therapy for chronic total coronary occlusion. PET alone, however, is the preferred modality to address functional status of the coronary circulation and response over time, if required, to medical or interventional therapy. CT at a minimum provides attenuation correction. More detailed CCTA should be added only when a well-defined need for anatomical information is required to answer the clinical question posed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.