ArticleJournal of clinical gastroenterology
Validity of a Web-based educational program to disseminate a standardized bowel preparation rating scale.
Article in Journal of clinical gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Video on Diet Before Outpatient Colonoscopy Does Not Improve Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016Trial
- Risk Analysis of Pancreatitis With Pancreatolithiasis in Relation to Dyslipidemia as a Cofactor.Cureus · 2026Article
- Development and validation of multivariable prognostic machine learning models to identify patients at risk for inadequate bowel preparation when undergoing colonoscopy: a prospective, multicentre study.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Restrictive diets are unnecessary for colonoscopy: Non-inferiority randomized trial.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- An intraprocedural bowel cleansing system for difficult-to-prepare patients-A multicenter prospective feasibility study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Article
- Inadequate Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores predict the risk of missed neoplasia on the next colonoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2018Observational
- Quality of Colonoscopy Performed in Rural Practice: Experience From the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative and the Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2018Article
- Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.United European gastroenterology journal · 2017Review
- Multiple, zonal and multi-zone adenoma detection rates according to quality of cleansing during colonoscopy.United European gastroenterology journal · 2016Article
- A Review on the Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016Review
- Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2014Observational
- Clinical practice standards for colonoscopy.La Tunisie medicaleReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
goalsOur goal was to assess the validity of a Web-based educational program on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS).
backgroundData on Web-based education for improving the practice and quality of colonoscopy are limited. STUDY: Endoscopists worldwide participated in the BBPS Educational Program. We assessed program completion rates, satisfaction, short-term (0 to 90 d) and long-term (91 to 180 d) uptake of the BBPS, and the validity of the program by measuring the reliability of the BBPS among participants.
resultsA total of 207 endoscopists completed the program. Overall, 93% found the content relevant, 89% felt confident in using the BBPS, and 97% thought the quality was good or excellent. Uptake of the BBPS into clinical practice was robust with 91% and 98% of colonoscopy reports containing the BBPS at short-term and long-term follow-up, respectively. The interobserver and test-retest reliability of BBPS segment and total scores were both substantial.
conclusionsA BBPS Web-based educational program facilitates adoption into clinical practice and teaches the BBPS to be used reliably by a diverse group of endoscopists worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.