Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24463765›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2014

Recent developments in copper and zinc homeostasis in bacterial pathogens.

Joseph J Braymer, David P Giedroc

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Kupyaphores─Self-Assembling Diisocyanolipopeptide ZnJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mirror proteorhodopsins.Communications chemistry · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Unique underlying principles shaping copper homeostasis networks.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph J BraymerDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-7102, USA.
David P GiedrocDepartment of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-7102, USA. Electronic address: giedroc@indiana.edu.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

ZINC COORDINATION AND REGULATION OF ZINC METALLOPROTEINSR01GM042569 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI GIEDROC, DAVID P. · 1996 to 2015
$4.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM042569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copper and zinc homeostasis systems in pathogenic bacteria are required to resist host efforts to manipulate the availability and toxicity of these metal ions. Central to this microbial adaptive response is the involvement of metal-trafficking and metal-sensing proteins that ultimately exercise control of metal speciation in the cell. Cu-specific and Zn-specific metalloregulatory proteins regulate the transcription of metal-responsive genes while metallochaperones and related proteins ensure that these metals are appropriately buffered by the intracellular milieu and delivered to correct intracellular targets. In this review, we summarize recent findings on how bacterial pathogens mount a metal-specific response to derail host efforts to win the 'fight over metals.'

Indexed as

HomeostasisBacteriaBacterial ProteinsBiological TransportCopperHumansZincBacterial ProteinsCopperZinc

Identifiers

PMID24463765
PMCPMC4008645
OpenAlexW2033756786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.