Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24463665›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2014

Ovarian cancer rates after hysterectomy with and without salpingo-oophorectomy.

John K Chan, Renata Urban, Angela M Capra, Vanessa Jacoby, Kathryn Osann, Alice Whittemore, Laurel A Habel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bilateral Oophorectomy Prevalence Among U.S. Women.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

John K ChanDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, and the Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, the Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, the Division of Medical Oncology, Chao Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine-Medical Center, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, and the Division of Epidemiology, Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Renata Urban
Angela M Capra
Vanessa Jacoby
Kathryn Osann
Alice Whittemore
Laurel A Habel
National Health Insurance Fund · RS

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Melanie Funes · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
Prophylactic oophorectomy: practice patterns & outcomesR03AG032602 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHAN, JOHN K. · 2008 to 2009
$141k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NIA NIH HHS 1R03AG032602-01NIA NIH HHS R03 AG032602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate ovarian and peritoneal cancer rates after hysterectomy with and without salpingo-oophorectomy for benign conditions.

methodsAll patients after hysterectomy for benign disease from 1988 to 2006 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California, an integrated health organization. Incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were calculated.

resultsOf 56,692 patients, the majority (54%) underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; 7% had hysterectomy with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 39% had hysterectomy alone. There were 40 ovarian and eight peritoneal cancers diagnosed during follow-up. Median age at ovarian and peritoneal cancer diagnosis was 50 and 64 years, respectively. Age-standardized rates (per 100,000 person-years) of ovarian or peritoneal cancer were 26.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 16-37.5) for those with hysterectomy alone, 22.8 (95% CI 0.0-46.8) for hysterectomy and unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 3.9 (95% CI 1.5-6.4) for hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Rates of ovarian cancer were 26.2 (95% CI 15.5-37) for those with hysterectomy alone, 17.5 (95% CI 0.0-39.1) for hysterectomy and unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 1.7 (95% CI 0.4-3) for those with hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Compared with women undergoing hysterectomy alone, those receiving an unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy had a hazard ratio (HR) for ovarian cancer of 0.58 (95% CI 0.18-1.9) and those undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy had an HR of 0.12 (95% CI 0.05-0.28).

conclusionsThe removal of both ovaries decreases the incidence of ovarian and peritoneal cancers. Removal of one ovary might also decrease the incidence of ovarian cancer but warrants further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Indexed as

HysterectomyOvariectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaliforniaCarcinomaFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24463665
PMCPMC4624417
OpenAlexW2327221350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.