Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24463649›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2014

[Intensive care unit acquired weakness. Pathogenesis, treatment, rehabilitation and outcome].

M Ponfick, K Bösl, J Lüdemann-Podubecka, G Neumann, M Pohl, D A Nowak, H-J Gdynia

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M PonfickKlinik Kipfenberg GmbH, Kindinger Str. 13, 85110, Kipfenberg, Deutschland, matthias.ponfick@neurologie-kipfenberg.de.
K Bösl
J Lüdemann-Podubecka
G Neumann
M Pohl
D A Nowak
H-J Gdynia
Helios Klinik Kipfenberg · DEKlinik Bavaria · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW) in the setting of neurological rehabilitation is steadily increasing. This is due to the fact that the intensive care of patients with sepsis or after cardiac or abdominal surgery is improving. A longer duration of respiratory weaning and comorbidities frequently complicate rehabilitation. Clinically, patients present with a flaccid (tetra) paresis and electrophysiological studies have shown axonal damage. Besides involvement of peripheral nerves, muscle can also be affected (critical illness myopathy) leading to ICUAW with inconstant myopathic damage patterns found by electrophysiological testing. Mixed forms can also be found. A specific therapy for ICUAW is not available. Early mobilization to be initiated on the intensive care unit and commencing neurological rehabilitation improve the outcome of ICUAW. This review highlights the current literature regarding the etiology and diagnosis of ICUAW. Furthermore, studies about rehabilitation and outcome of ICUAW are discussed.

Indexed as

Critical CareBed RestEarly AmbulationEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMuscle WeaknessRespiration, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID24463649
OpenAlexW229588081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.