Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24463450›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2014

Taxonomy of breast cancer based on normal cell phenotype predicts outcome.

Sandro Santagata, Ankita Thakkar, Ayse Ergonul, Bin Wang, Terri Woo, Rong Hu, J Chuck Harrell, George McNamara, Matthew Schwede, Aedin C Culhane and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Ductal keratin 15NPJ breast cancer · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sandro Santagata
Ankita Thakkar
Ayse Ergonul
Bin Wang
Terri Woo
Rong Hu
J Chuck Harrell
George McNamara
Matthew Schwede
Aedin C Culhane
David Kindelberger
Scott Rodig
Andrea Richardson
Stuart J Schnitt
Rulla M Tamimi
Tan A Ince
Harvard University Press · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Epigenomic Mapping in Human Tumor Stem CellsR01CA146445 · NCI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI INCE, TAN A., LEE, TONG IHN · 2009 to 2013
$3.1M
Heat Shock Directed Drug Discovery For The Treatment Of GliomasK08NS064168 · NINDS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SANTAGATA, SANDRO · 2008 to 2012
$900k
NCI NIH HHS BC-07456NCI NIH HHS R01 CA146445NCI NIH HHS R01-CA146445-01NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS064168NINDS NIH HHS K08NS064168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification is essential for understanding the pathophysiology of a disease and can inform therapeutic choices. For hematopoietic malignancies, a classification scheme based on the phenotypic similarity between tumor cells and normal cells has been successfully used to define tumor subtypes; however, use of normal cell types as a reference by which to classify solid tumors has not been widely emulated, in part due to more limited understanding of epithelial cell differentiation compared with hematopoiesis. To provide a better definition of the subtypes of epithelial cells comprising the breast epithelium, we performed a systematic analysis of a large set of breast epithelial markers in more than 15,000 normal breast cells, which identified 11 differentiation states for normal luminal cells. We then applied information from this analysis to classify human breast tumors based on normal cell types into 4 major subtypes, HR0-HR3, which were differentiated by vitamin D, androgen, and estrogen hormone receptor (HR) expression. Examination of 3,157 human breast tumors revealed that these HR subtypes were distinct from the current classification scheme, which is based on estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Patient outcomes were best when tumors expressed all 3 hormone receptors (subtype HR3) and worst when they expressed none of the receptors (subtype HR0). Together, these data provide an ontological classification scheme associated with patient survival differences and provides actionable insights for treating breast tumors.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntigens, CDBiomarkersBreastBreast NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCohort StudiesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHematopoiesisHumansImmunohistochemistryAntigens, CDBiomarkersReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, CalcitriolReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID24463450
PMCPMC3904619
OpenAlexW2121139881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.