Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24462939›Full record

ArticleBrain research2014

Long-term improvements in sensory inhibition with gestational choline supplementation linked to α7 nicotinic receptors through studies in Chrna7 null mutation mice.

Karen E Stevens, Kevin S Choo, Jerry A Stitzel, Michael J Marks, Catherine E Adams

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Prenatal choline and the development of schizophrenia.Shanghai archives of psychiatry · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen E StevensMedical Research Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, Anchutz Medical Campus, 12800 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: Karen.Stevens@ucdenver.edu.
Kevin S ChooMedical Research Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Jerry A StitzelInstitute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Michael J MarksInstitute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Catherine E AdamsMedical Research Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, Anchutz Medical Campus, 12800 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

STATISTICAL GENETICS AND TREATMENT ANALYSISP50MH086383 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FREEDMAN, ROBERT · 2009 to 2013
$10.6M
Circadian Variations in Nicotine Sensitivity in MiceR21DA022462 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI STITZEL, JERRY A · 2007 to 2008
$413k
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA022462NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA022462NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH086383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perinatal choline supplementation has produced several benefits in rodent models, from improved learning and memory to protection from the behavioral effects of fetal alcohol exposure. We have shown that supplemented choline through gestation and lactation produces long-term improvement in deficient sensory inhibition in DBA/2 mice which models a similar deficit in schizophrenia patients. The present study extends that research by feeding normal or supplemented choline diets to DBA/2 mice carrying the null mutation for the α7 nicotinic receptor gene (Chrna7). DBA/2 mice heterozygotic for Chrna7 were bred together. Dams were placed on supplemented (5 gm/kg diet) or normal (1.1 gm/kg diet) choline at mating and remained on the specific diet until offspring weaning. Thereafter, offspring were fed standard rodent chow. Adult offspring were assessed for sensory inhibition. Brains were obtained to ascertain hippocampal α7 nicotinic receptor levels. Choline-supplemented mice heterozygotic or null-mutant for Chrna7 failed to show improvement in sensory inhibition. Only wildtype choline-supplemented mice showed improvement with the effect solely through a decrease in test amplitude. This supports the hypothesis that gestational-choline supplementation is acting through the α7 nicotinic receptor to improve sensory inhibition. Although there was a significant gene-dose-related change in hippocampal α7 receptor numbers, binding studies did not reveal any choline-dose-related change in binding in any hippocampal region, the interaction being driven by a significant genotype main effect (wildtype>heterozygote>null mutant). These data parallel a human study wherein the offspring of pregnant women receiving choline supplementation during gestation, showed better sensory inhibition than offspring of women on placebo.

Indexed as

Acoustic Stimulationalpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorAnimalsBungarotoxinsCholineDietary SupplementsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGenotypeHabituation, PsychophysiologicHippocampusLactationMaleMiceMice, Inbred DBAMice, Knockoutalpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorBungarotoxinsCholineChrna7 protein, mouseNicotinic AgonistsChrna7 null mutationDBA/2 miceGestational choline supplementationSensory gatingSensory inhibition

Identifiers

PMID24462939
PMCPMC4405170
OpenAlexW2149870741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.