Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24462230›Full record

Trial reportBiological psychiatry2014

Pretreatment brain states identify likely nonresponse to standard treatments for depression.

Callie L McGrath, Mary E Kelley, Boadie W Dunlop, Paul E Holtzheimer, W Edward Craighead, Helen S Mayberg

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biological psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Anterior cingulate cortex activation during attentional control as a transdiagnostic marker of psychotherapy response: a randomized clinical trial.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  4. Metabolic activity in subcallosal cingulate predicts response to deep brain stimulation for depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Breakthroughs and challenges for generating brain network-based biomarkers of treatment response in depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Balancing the beautiful and the good in pursuit of biomarkers for depression.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Callie L McGrathDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Graduate Division of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mary E KelleyDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Boadie W DunlopDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Paul E HoltzheimerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Psychiatry and Department of Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
W Edward CraigheadDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Helen S MaybergDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: hmayber@emory.edu.

Funding

Testing an Imaging Biomarker for Treatment Stratification in Major DepressionR01MH073719 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DUNLOP, BOADIE W · 2006 to 2018
$5.8M
TRAINING IN SYSTEMS AND INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY:NEUROSCIENCET32GM008605 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, YOLAND · 1996 to 2015
$4.2M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN TISSUE REPAIRT32GM008695 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI DIEGELMANN, ROBERT F · 1998 to 2009
$958k
Investigating structural-functional brain abnormalities in late-life depressionK23MH077869 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HOLTZHEIMER, PAUL E · 2007 to 2010
$687k
Neural Correlates of Loss Aversion in Major DepressionK23MH086690 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DUNLOP, BOADIE W · 2009 to 2011
$521k
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008605NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008695NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM08695NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH077869NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH086690NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment approaches for major depressive disorder (MDD) result in approximately one third of patients achieving remission after a first treatment. Added treatment generally improves remission rates, but approximately one third of all patients fail to respond after several treatments (sequential monotherapies or combined treatment). A pretreatment biomarker could help identify these patients. Overactivity of the subcallosal cingulate has been associated with failure of response to treatment in MDD, and it is a potential candidate for such a biomarker.

methodsInvestigators enrolled 82 patients with MDD currently not receiving treatment in a two-phase treatment study. Patients underwent a fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan. After scanning, patients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of treatment with either escitalopram or cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Patients not achieving remission after 12 weeks of initial treatment were treated with an additional 12 weeks of escitalopram plus CBT. Subcallosal cingulate metabolism was compared between patients who failed to achieve a response and patients who achieved remission as a result of either phase one or phase two treatment. This analysis was followed by a whole-brain analysis making the same comparison.

resultsAfter two phases of treatment (24 weeks), 36 patients were identified as remitters, 6 patients were responders, and 9 patients were nonresponders. Subcallosal cingulate metabolism was significantly higher in nonresponders than remitters. In the follow-up whole-brain analysis, increased superior temporal sulcus activity was also associated with nonresponse to two treatments.

conclusionsPatients with MDD who fail to achieve remission as a result of CBT or escitalopram, either alone or in combination, have a distinct brain metabolic pattern compared with patients who achieve remission as a result of CBT, escitalopram, or their combination.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAdultCitalopramCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gyrus CinguliHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyTreatment OutcomeCitalopramFluorodeoxyglucose F18Antidepressant medicationbiomarkerdepressionpsychotherapysubcallosal cingulatesuperior temporal sulcus

Identifiers

PMID24462230
PMCPMC4063885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.