Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24461931›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2014

Accuracy of prenatal smoking data from Washington State birth certificates in a population-based sample with cotinine measurements.

Susan Searles Nielsen, Russell L Dills, Michael Glass, Beth A Mueller

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Disinfection By-Product Exposures and the Risk of Musculoskeletal Birth Defects.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Associations Between Disinfection By-Product Exposures and Craniofacial Birth Defects.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan Searles NielsenFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: snielsen@fhcrc.org.
Russell L DillsEnvironmental Health Laboratory and Trace Organics Analysis Center, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Michael GlassWashington State Department of Health, Newborn Screening Program, Shoreline, WA.
Beth A MuellerFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Seattle, WA.
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZAWashington State Department of Health · US

Funding

Accuracy of Self-Reported Prenatal Smoking in Child Cancer Epidemiology StudiesR03CA141487 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MUELLER, BETH A · 2009 to 2010
$176k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA141487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the accuracy of smoking data in contemporary U.S. birth certificates.

methodsWe compared data on prenatal smoking as reported on Washington State birth certificates to cotinine measured in archived newborn screening dried blood spots for 200 infants born in 2007 (100 randomly selected from births to self-reported nonsmokers and 100 born to self-reported smokers). We estimated the sensitivity of the birth certificate data to identify prenatal smokers and the precision with which self-identified third trimester smokers report smoking levels.

resultsInfants born to two (2%) mothers who reported they did not smoke during the pregnancy had whole blood cotinine concentrations consistent with active smoking by the mother (sensitivity 85%). Sensitivity of the birth certificate to identify reported smokers who continued to smoke throughout pregnancy was similar (89%). Among self-identified third trimester smokers whose infants' specimens were collected shortly after delivery, Spearman rho between infant cotinine and maternal-reported cigarettes/day in the third trimester was 0.54.

conclusionsBirth certificates may represent a viable option for assessing prenatal smoking status, and possibly smoking cessation and level among smokers, in epidemiologic studies sufficiently powered to overcome a moderate amount of exposure measurement error.

Indexed as

Birth CertificatesBiasCotinineFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal BehaviorMothersPopulation SurveillancePregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdSensitivity and SpecificitySmokingSmoking CessationWashingtonCotinineBias (Epidemiology)Birth certificatesCotininePregnancySensitivity and specificitySmokingSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID24461931
PMCPMC4714606
OpenAlexW2092486527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.