Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24461078›Full record

SynthesisSeminars in arthritis and rheumatism2014

"Generalized osteoarthritis": a systematic review.

Amanda E Nelson, Michael W Smith, Yvonne M Golightly, Joanne M Jordan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Epidemiology of Hip Osteoarthritis: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda E NelsonThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Doc J. Thurston Building, Campus Box 7280, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7280; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: aenelson@med.unc.edu.
Michael W SmithThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Doc J. Thurston Building, Campus Box 7280, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7280; Saint Luke's Hospitals, Kansas City, MO.
Yvonne M GolightlyThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Doc J. Thurston Building, Campus Box 7280, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7280; Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Joanne M JordanThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Doc J. Thurston Building, Campus Box 7280, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7280; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Funding

UNC Clinical Translation Science Award-K12 Scholars Program (KL2)KL2TR000084 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2012 to 2013
$2.3M
Variations in Hip Morphology: Frequency and Impact on Osteoarthritis OutcomesK23AR061406 · NIAMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NELSON, AMANDA E · 2011 to 2015
$668k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000084NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000084NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR061406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGiven the conflicting definitions of "generalized osteoarthritis" (GOA) in the literature, we performed a systematic review of GOA definitions, risk factors, and outcomes.

methodsWe searched the MEDLINE literature with the terms osteoarthritis, generalized, polyarticular, multiple joint, and multi-joint to obtain articles related to GOA, following evidence-based guidelines. Titles and abstracts of 948 articles were reviewed, with full-text review of 108. Data were extracted based on pre-specified criteria for 74 articles plus 24 identified through bibliographic review (n = 98).

resultsTwenty-four large cohorts (n ~ 30,000) were represented along with numerous clinical series (n ~ 9000), across 22 countries and 60 years (1952-2012). No less than 15 definitions of GOA were given in 30 studies with a stated GOA definition; at least 6 groups used a summed score of joints or radiographic grades. Prevalence estimates based on these GOA definitions were 1-80%, although most were 5-25%. Increased risk and progression of GOA was associated with age, female sex, and genetic/familial factors. Associations with increased body mass index or bone mineral density were not consistent. A study estimated the heritability of GOA at 42%. Collagen biomarker levels increased with the number of involved joints. Increased OA burden was associated with increased mortality and disability, poorer health, and function.

conclusionWhile there remains no standard definition of GOA, this term is commonly used. The impact on health may be greater when OA is in more than one joint. A descriptive term, such as multi-joint or polyarticular OA, designating OA of multiple joints or joint groups is recommended.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHumansOsteoarthritisRadiographyTerminology as TopicBiomarkersGeneralized osteoarthritisSystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID24461078
PMCPMC4065634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.