Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24460974›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2014

Implementation of smoking cessation guidelines in the emergency department: a qualitative study of staff perceptions.

David A Katz, Monica W Paez, Heather S Reisinger, Meghan T Gillette, Mark W Vander Weg, Marita G Titler, Andrew S Nugent, Laurence J Baker, John E Holman, Sarah S Ono

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00756704 (The Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Guidelines in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00756704 nacompletednot on this map

The Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Guidelines in the Emergency Department

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of IowaRan2008 to 2011Enrolled789ConditionsCigarette SmokingArmsSmoking cessation guideline implementation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Attitudes and practices of health care providers towards improving adherence to smoking cessation medications in Australia: A descriptive study.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2023
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David A KatzDepartment of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. david-katz@uiowa.edu.
Monica W Paez
Heather S Reisinger
Meghan T Gillette
Mark W Vander Weg
Marita G Titler
Andrew S Nugent
Laurence J Baker
John E Holman
Sarah S Ono

Funding

The Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Guidelines in the Emergency DepartmentR21DA021607 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI KATZ, DAVID A · 2008 to 2009
$413k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA021607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US Public Health Service smoking cessation practice guideline specifically recommends that physicians and nurses strongly advise their patients who use tobacco to quit, but the best approach for attaining this goal in the emergency department (ED) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to characterize emergency physicians' (EPs) and nurses' (ENs) perceptions of cessation counseling and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation of the 5 A's framework (Ask-Advise-Assess-Assist-Arrange) in the ED.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured, face-to-face interviews of 11 EPs and 19 ENs following a pre-post implementation trial of smoking cessation guidelines in two study EDs. We used purposeful sampling to target EPs and ENs with different attitudes toward cessation counseling, based on their responses to a written survey (Decisional Balance Questionnaire). Conventional content analysis was used to inductively characterize the issues raised by study participants and to construct a coding structure, which was then applied to study transcripts.

resultsThe main findings of this study converged upon three overarching domains: 1) reactions to the intervention; 2) perceptions of patients' receptivity to cessation counseling; and 3) perspectives on ED cessation counseling and preventive care. ED staff expressed ambivalence toward the implementation of smoking cessation guidelines. Both ENs and EPs agreed that the delivery of smoking cessation counseling is important, but that it is not always practical in the ED on account of time constraints, the competing demands of acute care, and resistance from patients. Participants also called attention to the need for improved role clarity and teamwork when implementing the 5 A's in the ED.

conclusionsThere are numerous challenges to the implementation of smoking cessation guidelines in the ED. ENs are generally willing to take the lead in offering brief cessation counseling, but their efforts need to be reinforced by EPs. ED systems need to address workflow, teamwork, and practice policies that facilitate prescription of smoking cessation medication, referral for cessation counseling, and follow-up in primary care. The results of this qualitative evaluation can be used to guide the design of future ED intervention studies.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00756704.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCounselingEmergency Service, HospitalEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHospitals, CommunityHospitals, UniversityHumansIowaMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID24460974
PMCPMC3902188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.