Trial reportAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2014
Use of continuous ECG for improvements in assessing the standing response as a positive control for QT prolongation.
Trial report in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- QT interval variations and mortality risk: is there any relationship?Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStanding invoked change in QT interval has been identified as a promising autonomic maneuver for the assessment of QT/QTc prolongation in patients with underlying heart abnormalities or as a positive control in healthy volunteers for drug studies. Criticism for its more widespread use is the high variability in reported results and the need for a more standardized methodology with defined normal ranges.
methodsForty healthy male subjects underwent continuous ECG collection on the day before dosing in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single ascending dose trial. A brisk supine to standing (3 minutes) response was conducted at three time points. Results were grouped by treatment cohort or assessed as a pooled group at each time point. Maximum time and median change from baseline (ΔTmax QTcF, ΔQTcF) were calculated for each individual over sequential 30-second periods staggered by 5 seconds.
resultsMaximum ΔQTcF at all time points and in all groups was significant (i.e., the lower bound of 90% CI was > 5 milliseconds) which is the ICH E14 regulatory requirement for a positive control. Variability of the time to maximum response was also reduced 9-fold by the third time period.
conclusionsStanding invoked ΔQTcF can be utilized to validate the sensitivity of a study for assessment of the QT interval effect of drugs in early development. The methodology may be used to further improve its diagnostic use of long QT syndromes by reducing the variability and allowing adequate definition of normal limits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.