Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24460691›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2015

Positive allosteric modulators of the μ-opioid receptor: a novel approach for future pain medications.

N T Burford, J R Traynor, A Alt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular mechanism of allosteric modulation of opioid receptors.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Advances in the structural understanding of opioid allostery.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Negative allosteric modulation of CBNeuropharmacology · 2024
    Article
  10. Protective role of MJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Should oncologists trust cannabinoids?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  18. Negative allosteric modulation of CBPharmacological research · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Activation mechanism of the μ-opioid receptor by an allosteric modulator.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N T BurfordGPCR Lead Discovery & Optimization, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Wallingford, CT, USA.
J R Traynor
A Alt
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Allosteric Modulation of the Mu-Opioid ReceptorR37DA039997 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TRAYNOR, JOHN R. · 2015 to 2024
$6.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA039997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledMorphine and other agonists of the μ-opioid receptor are used clinically for acute and chronic pain relief and are considered to be the gold standard for pain medication. However, these opioids also have significant side effects, which are also mediated via activation of the μ-opioid receptor. Since the latter half of the twentieth century, researchers have sought to tease apart the mechanisms underlying analgesia, tolerance and dependence, with the hope of designing drugs with fewer side effects. These efforts have revolved around the design of orthosteric agonists with differing pharmacokinetic properties and/or selectivity profiles for the different opioid receptor types. Recently, μ-opioid receptor-positive allosteric modulators (μ-PAMs) were identified, which bind to a (allosteric) site on the μ-opioid receptor separate from the orthosteric site that binds an endogenous agonist. These allosteric modulators have little or no detectable functional activity when bound to the receptor in the absence of orthosteric agonist, but can potentiate the activity of bound orthosteric agonist, seen as an increase in apparent potency and/or efficacy of the orthosteric agonist. In this review, we describe the potential advantages that a μ-PAM approach might bring to the design of novel therapeutics for pain that may lack the side effects currently associated with opioid therapy. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-2.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsHumansLigandsPainReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesics, OpioidLigandsReceptors, Opioid, muallostericarrestindependenceligand biasmodulatoropiateopioidpainreceptortolerance

Identifiers

PMID24460691
PMCPMC4292945
OpenAlexW1922816396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.