ArticleGigaScience2014
CGtag: complete genomics toolkit and annotation in a cloud-based Galaxy.
Article in GigaScience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Data Integration Challenges for Machine Learning in Precision Medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Galactic Circos: User-friendly Circos plots within the Galaxy platform.GigaScience · 2020Article
- Closha: bioinformatics workflow system for the analysis of massive sequencing data.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Novel genetic risk variants for pediatric celiac disease.Human genomics · 2016Article
- Discriminating somatic and germline mutations in tumor DNA samples without matching normals.Genome research · 2015Article
- From big data analysis to personalized medicine for all: challenges and opportunities.BMC medical genomics · 2015Review
- Identification of cancer predisposition variants in apparently healthy individuals using a next-generation sequencing-based family genomics approach.Human genomics · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplete Genomics provides an open-source suite of command-line tools for the analysis of their CG-formatted mapped sequencing files. Determination of; for example, the functional impact of detected variants, requires annotation with various databases that often require command-line and/or programming experience; thus, limiting their use to the average research scientist. We have therefore implemented this CG toolkit, together with a number of annotation, visualisation and file manipulation tools in Galaxy called CGtag (Complete Genomics Toolkit and Annotation in a Cloud-based Galaxy).
findingsIn order to provide research scientists with web-based, simple and accurate analytical and visualisation applications for the selection of candidate mutations from Complete Genomics data, we have implemented the open-source Complete Genomics tool set, CGATools, in Galaxy. In addition we implemented some of the most popular command-line annotation and visualisation tools to allow research scientists to select candidate pathological mutations (SNV, and indels). Furthermore, we have developed a cloud-based public Galaxy instance to host the CGtag toolkit and other associated modules.
conclusionsCGtag provides a user-friendly interface to all research scientists wishing to select candidate variants from CG or other next-generation sequencing platforms' data. By using a cloud-based infrastructure, we can also assure sufficient and on-demand computation and storage resources to handle the analysis tasks. The tools are freely available for use from an NBIC/CTMM-TraIT (The Netherlands Bioinformatics Center/Center for Translational Molecular Medicine) cloud-based Galaxy instance, or can be installed to a local (production) Galaxy via the NBIC Galaxy tool shed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.