Draft Genome Sequence of Williamsia sp. Strain D3, Isolated From the Darwin Mountains, Antarctica.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Effect of Biochar on Metal Distribution and Microbiome Dynamic of a Phytostabilized Metalloid-Contaminated Soil Following Freeze-Thaw Cycles.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
   Article
2. Actinobacteria From Desert: Diversity and Biotechnological Applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
   Review
3. Draft genome of the Arabidopsis thaliana phyllosphere bacterium, Williamsia sp. ARP1.Standards in genomic sciences · 2016
   Article
4. Isolation of a significant fraction of non-phototroph diversity from a desert Biological Soil Crust.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015
   Article
5. Microbial ecology and biogeochemistry of continental Antarctic soils.Frontiers in microbiology · 2014
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract