Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24459038›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2014

Proposed regulations for research with biospecimens: responses from stakeholders at CTSA consortium institutions.

Jeffrey R Botkin, Rebecca Anderson, Tom Murray, Laura M Beskow, Karen Maschke, Leona Cuttler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Proposed Process for Reliably Updating the Common Rule.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2017
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeffrey R BotkinDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Rebecca Anderson
Tom Murray
Laura M Beskow
Karen Maschke
Leona Cuttler

Funding

ADVANCING COLLABORATIVE GENETIC RESEARCH: ETHICAL AND POLICY CHALLENGESR01HG005691 · NHGRI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI RIVERA, SUZANNE · 2011 to 2013
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG005691NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secondary research with biospecimens acquired through clinical care and through research is often conducted without the informed consent of individuals from whom the specimens were acquired. While such uses are consistent with the current federal regulations, surveys of the general public suggest that many individuals would prefer more information and choice regarding research use of biospecimens. The federal government issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) in 2011 that proposed a number of potential changes in the regulations governing human subjects. These proposed regulations are particularly pertinent to institutions committed to research involving human subjects-including institutions in the NIH-funded Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) consortium. In this study, we reviewed public responses by CTSA-funded institutions and CTSA-affiliated organizations and groups regarding the proposed changes in the ANPRM with respect to research with biospecimens. Our results indicate that the majority of responses to the ANPRM from CTSA institutions were not supportive of the proposed changes. While many responses acknowledge a need to change current research practices regarding biospecimens, the proposed changes in the ANPRM received only limited support from this subgroup of academic research institutions.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorHumansResearchSpecimen HandlingTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited Statesbiospecimensethicsinformed consent

Identifiers

PMID24459038
PMCPMC3960336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.