ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2014
EURECCA consensus conference highlights about colorectal cancer clinical management: the pathologists expert review.
Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association Between Mesorectal Grade and Oncologic Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2017Guideline
- Liposomal Delivery of Pyronaridine as a Repurposed Inhibitor of ERCC1/XPF for the Sensitization of Colorectal Cancer Cells to Platinum Chemotherapeutics.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- The prognostic importance of MRI detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) in locally advanced rectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Article
- The Efficacy of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: a Preliminary Vietnamese Report.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2020Article
- [Pathology of the R1 classification in visceral cancer surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017Review
- Colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2015Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Care for patients with colon and rectal cancer has improved in the last 20 years; however, a considerable variation still exists in cancer management and outcome between European countries. Large variation is also apparent between national guidelines and patterns of cancer care in Europe. Therefore, EURECCA, which is the acronym of European Registration of Cancer Care, is aiming at defining core treatment strategies and developing a European audit structure in order to improve the quality of care for all patients with colon and rectal cancer. In December 2012, the first multidisciplinary consensus conference about cancer of the colon and rectum was held. The expert panel consisted of representatives of European scientific organizations involved in cancer care of patients with colon and rectal cancer and representatives of national colorectal registries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24458515What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.