Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24458469›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2014

Altered cleavage patterns in human tripronuclear embryos and their association to fertilization method: a time-lapse study.

Mette Warming Joergensen, Inge Agerholm, Johnny Hindkjaer, Lars Bolund, Lone Sunde, Hans Jakob Ingerslev, Kirstine Kirkegaard

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Human germline genome editing.Nature cell biology · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Live birth rate and number of blastomeres on day 2 transfer.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mette Warming JoergensenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Vejle Hospital, Kappeltoft 25, 7100, Vejle, Denmark, mette.warming.joergensen@rsyd.dk.
Inge Agerholm
Johnny Hindkjaer
Lars Bolund
Lone Sunde
Hans Jakob Ingerslev
Kirstine Kirkegaard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the cleavage patterns in dipronuclear (2PN) and tripronuclear (3PN) embryos in relation to fertilization method.

methodTime-lapse analysis.

resultsCompared to 2PN, more 3PN IVF embryos displayed early cleavage into 3 cells (p < 0.001), displayed longer duration of the 3-cell stage (p < 0.001), and arrested development from the compaction stage and onwards (p < 0.001). For the IVF embryos, the 2nd and 3rd cleavage cycles were completed within the expected time frame. However, timing of the cell divisions within the cleavage cycles differed between the two groups. In contrast, the completion of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd cleavage cycle was delayed, but with a similar division pattern for 3PN ICSI compared with the 2PN ICSI embryos. 3PN, more often than 2PN ICSI embryos, displayed early cleavage into 3 cells (p = 0.03) and arrested development from the compaction stage and onwards (p = 0.001). More 3PN IVF than ICSI embryos displayed early cleavage into 3 cells (p < 0.001).

conclusionsThis study reports differences in cleavage patterns between 2PN and 3PN embryos and for the first time demonstrates differences in the cleavage pattern between 3PN IVF and ICSI embryos.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentFertilization in VitroSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicEmbryo, MammalianFemaleFertilizationHumansTime-Lapse Imaging

Identifiers

PMID24458469
PMCPMC3969464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.