Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24458428›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2014

Biomaterial scaffolds for treating osteoporotic bone.

Julie A Sterling, Scott A Guelcher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Advances in Osteoporotic Bone Tissue Engineering.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recent developments in strontium-based biocomposites for bone regeneration.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie A SterlingDepartment of Veterans Affairs: Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (VISN 9), Nashville, USA, julie.sterling@vanderbilt.edu.
Scott A Guelcher
Vanderbilt University · USVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System · US

Funding

The Role of Mechanotransduction in Progression of Tumor-induced Bone DiseaseR01CA163499 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GUELCHER, SCOTT A, RHOADES (STERLING), JULIE A · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
Targeting the Bone Microenvironment to Reduce Tumor-induced Bone DiseaseI01BX001957 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI RHOADES (STERLING), JULIE A · 2013 to 2025
–
BLRD VA I01 BX001957NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healing fractures resulting from osteoporosis or cancer remains a significant clinical challenge. In these populations, healing is often impaired not only due to age and disease, but also by other therapeutic interventions such as radiation, steroids, and chemotherapy. Despite substantial improvements in the treatment of osteoporosis over the last few decades, osteoporotic fractures are still a major clinical challenge in the elderly population due to impaired healing. Similar fractures with impaired healing are also prevalent in cancer patients, especially those with tumor growing in bone. Treatment options for cancer patients are further complicated by the fact that bone anabolic therapies are contraindicated in patients with tumors. Therefore, many patients undergo surgery to repair the fracture, and bone grafts are often used to stabilize orthopedic implants and provide a scaffold for ingrowth of new bone. Both synthetic and naturally occurring biomaterials have been investigated as bone grafts for repair of osteoporotic fractures, including calcium phosphate bone cements, resorbable polymers, and allograft or autograft bone. In order to re-establish normal bone repair, bone grafts have been augmented with anabolic agents, such as mesenchymal stem cells or recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. These developing approaches to bone grafting are anticipated to improve the clinical management of osteoporotic and cancer-induced fractures.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone NeoplasmsBone TransplantationFracture FixationFractures, SpontaneousHumansOrthopedic Fixation DevicesOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesParathyroid HormoneRecombinant ProteinsTransforming Growth Factor betaBiocompatible MaterialsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Parathyroid Hormonerecombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2Recombinant ProteinsTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID24458428
PMCPMC4048367
OpenAlexW2142186105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.