Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24458080›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2014

Metabolic syndrome in peritoneal dialysis patients: choice of diagnostic criteria and prognostic implications.

Cheuk-Chun Szeto, Bonnie Ching-Ha Kwan, Kai-Ming Chow, Chi-Bon Leung, Mei-Shan Cheng, Man-Ching Law, Philip Kam-Tao Li

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Current State of Peritoneal Dialysis.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2016
    Review
  9. Metabolic syndrome and obesity in peritoneal dialysis.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2016
    Review
  10. Peritoneal Dialysis in Asia.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheuk-Chun SzetoFrom Carol and Richard Yu Peritoneal Dialysis Research Centre, Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Bonnie Ching-Ha Kwan
Kai-Ming Chow
Chi-Bon Leung
Mei-Shan Cheng
Man-Ching Law
Philip Kam-Tao Li
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNPrince of Wales Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIn the general population, metabolic syndrome (MES) is associated with cardiovascular risk. However, the definition of MES and its prognostic implication among patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) remain controversial. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We studied 329 prevalent PD patients from April 2008 to April 2011 and compared four sets of diagnostic criteria: the original World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria, the original National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) criteria, and the modified NCEP criteria. Nutritional status, body composition, and arterial pulse-wave velocity were measured. Patients were followed for 31.7 ± 15.5 months.

resultsAmong the 329 patients, 175 (53.2%) fulfilled the WHO criteria, 177 (53.8%) the IDF criteria, 199 (60.5%) the original NCEP criteria, and 218 (66.3%) the modified NCEP criteria. The agreement among the four sets of criteria was fair to moderate (Cohen κ=0.35-0.58). Patients with MES defined by all four criteria had higher adipose tissue mass than the others, although the difference in adipose tissue mass was most pronounced with the IDF criteria (MES versus no MES, 18.2 ± 7.9 versus 10.7 ± 5.9 kg; P<0.001). Patients with MES, as defined by the IDF criteria, were hospitalized longer than those without MES (3.82 [interquartile range, 0.00-12.61] versus 1.07 [interquartile range, 0.00-6.43]) days per year of follow-up; P=0.01). Overall survival, cardiovascular survival, or technique survival did not differ between patients with and without MES, irrespective of the diagnostic criteria after adjustment for diabetic status.

conclusionIn patients undergoing PD, overall survival, cardiovascular survival, and technique survival did not differ between patients with and without MES, irrespective of diabetic status and diagnostic criteria. Further studies are needed to establish a new definition or clinical scoring system for risk stratification of PD patients.

Indexed as

Peritoneal DialysisAdiposityAdultAgedFemaleHong KongHumansKidney Failure, ChronicLength of StayMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedNutritional StatusPredictive Value of TestsPrevalencePulse Wave Analysiscardiovascular diseasemetabolismobesity

Identifiers

PMID24458080
PMCPMC3974356
OpenAlexW2109298910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.