Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24457345›Full record

SynthesisClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2014

Lower pill burden and once-daily antiretroviral treatment regimens for HIV infection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Jean B Nachega, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Olalekan A Uthman, Robert Gross, David W Dowdy, Paul E Sax, Joel E Gallant, Michael J Mugavero, Edward J Mills, Thomas P Giordano

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02596334 (Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Dolutegravir Monotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 183 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
183citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
27.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02596334 phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Dolutegravir Monotherapy (Tivicay®) Versus the Maintenance of a Successful Triple Therapy Using Abacavir + Lamivudine + Dolutegravir (Triumeq®) in HIV-1- Infected Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansRan2015 to 2018Enrolled158ConditionsHIVArmsdolutegravir 50mg +abacavir 600mg +lamivudine 300mg, dolutegravir
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

183 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 348 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antiretroviral Postexposure Prophylaxis After Sexual, Injection Drug Use, or Other Nonoccupational Exposure to HIV - CDC Recommendations, United States, 2025.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

123 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Jean B NachegaDepartment of Epidemiology, Pittsburgh University Graduate School of Public Health, Pennsylvania.
Jean-Jacques Parienti
Olalekan A Uthman
Robert Gross
David W Dowdy
Paul E Sax
Joel E Gallant
Michael J Mugavero
Edward J Mills
Thomas P Giordano
Johns Hopkins University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCenter for Clinical Research (United States) · USLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USSouthwest Regional Wound Care Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Ottawa · CAVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

Virus & Reservoirs CoreP30AI045008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVID S METZGER · 1999 to 2026
$78.6M
Harvard Medical School Vaccine Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069412 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Lindsey Robert Baden, Daniel R. Kuritzkes · 2012 to 2026
$57.2M
Virology CoreP30AI036211 · NIAID · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BUTEL, JANET S · 1994 to 2015
$21.7M
Stellenbosch University Clinical Trial Unit, Cape Town, South AfricaUM1AI069521 · NIAID · STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY · PI Shaun Barnabas, Anneke Catharina Hesseling · 2012 to 2026
$21.5M
Stellenbosch University Clinical Trial Unit, Cape Town, South AfricaU01AI069521 · NIAID · STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY · PI COTTON, MARK FREDRIC · 2007 to 2011
$8.4M
Harvard Medical School Vaccine Clinical Trials UnitU01AI069412 · NIAID · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DOLIN, RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$5.4M
NIAID NIH HHS 2UM1AI069521-08NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036211NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI 045008NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI045008NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069412NIAID NIH HHS UM1AI069412NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069521NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH083592NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH083592-01A1PHS HHS T84HA21652-01-00Wellcome Trust WT087537MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContemporary antiretroviral treatment regimens are simpler than in the past, with lower pill burden and once-daily dosing frequency common. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the impact of pill burden and once-daily vs twice-daily dosing on ART adherence and virological outcomes.

methodsA literature search of 4 electronic databases through 31 March 2013 was used. RCTs comparing once-daily vs twice-daily ART regimens that also reported on adherence and virological suppression were included. Study design, study population characteristics, intervention, outcome measures, and study quality were extracted. Study quality was rated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

resultsNineteen studies met our inclusion criteria (N = 6312 adult patients). Higher pill burden was associated with both lower adherence rates (P = .004) and worse virological suppression (P < .0001) in both once-daily and twice-daily subgroups, although the association with adherence in the once-daily subgroup was not statistically significant. The average adherence was modestly higher in once-daily regimens than twice-daily regimens (weighted mean difference = 2.55%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to 3.87; P = .0002). Patients on once-daily regimens did not achieve virological suppression more frequently than patients on twice-daily regimens (relative risk [RR] = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.03; P = .50). Both adherence and viral load suppression decreased over time, but adherence decreased less with once-daily dosing than with twice-daily dosing.

conclusionsLower pill burden was associated with both better adherence and virological suppression. Adherence, but not virological suppression, was slightly better with once- vs twice-daily regimens.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsHumansPatient ComplianceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicViral LoadAnti-HIV AgentsARTfixed-dose combinationonce-dailyrandomized controlled trialstwice-daily

Identifiers

PMID24457345
PMCPMC3982838
OpenAlexW2121737909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.