Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24457255›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2014

Cannabis, the pregnant woman and her child: weeding out the myths.

S C Jaques, A Kingsbury, P Henshcke, C Chomchai, S Clews, J Falconer, M E Abdel-Latif, J M Feller, J L Oei

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Motherhood and medicinal cannabis.Drug and alcohol review · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cannabis exposure during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: A cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Cannabis and Pregnancy: A Review.Obstetrical & gynecological survey · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Reasons for cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation: a qualitative study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

S C JaquesDepartment of Newborn Care, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
A KingsburyMater Miseriacordiae Health Service Brisbane, Mater Mothers' Hospital, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
P HenshckeMercy Women's Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
C ChomchaiMahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
S ClewsThe Langton Centre, Surry Hills, NSW, Australia.
J FalconerThe Langton Centre, Surry Hills, NSW, Australia.
M E Abdel-LatifThe Centenary Hospital for Women and Children, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
J M Feller1] The Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia [2] School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
J L Oei1] Department of Newborn Care, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW, Australia [2] School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Albion Centre · AUCentenary Institute · AUMahidol University · THMater Mothers' Hospital · AUMercy Hospital for Women · AURoyal Hospital for Women · AUSydney Children's Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To review and summarise the literature reporting on cannabis use within western communities with specific reference to patterns of use, the pharmacology of its major psychoactive compounds, including placental and fetal transfer, and the impact of maternal cannabis use on pregnancy, the newborn infant and the developing child. Review of published articles, governmental guidelines and data and book chapters. Although cannabis is one of the most widely used illegal drugs, there is limited data about the prevalence of cannabis use in pregnant women, and it is likely that reported rates of exposure are significantly underestimated. With much of the available literature focusing on the impact of other illicit drugs such as opioids and stimulants, the effects of cannabis use in pregnancy on the developing fetus remain uncertain. Current evidence indicates that cannabis use both during pregnancy and lactation, may adversely affect neurodevelopment, especially during periods of critical brain growth both in the developing fetal brain and during adolescent maturation, with impacts on neuropsychiatric, behavioural and executive functioning. These reported effects may influence future adult productivity and lifetime outcomes. Despite the widespread use of cannabis by young women, there is limited information available about the impact perinatal cannabis use on the developing fetus and child, particularly the effects of cannabis use while breast feeding. Women who are using cannabis while pregnant and breast feeding should be advised of what is known about the potential adverse effects on fetal growth and development and encouraged to either stop using or decrease their use. Long-term follow-up of exposed children is crucial as neurocognitive and behavioural problems may benefit from early intervention aimed to reduce future problems such as delinquency, depression and substance use.

Indexed as

AdultBreast FeedingCannabisChildFemaleFetal DevelopmentFetusHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMarijuana AbusePregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID24457255
OpenAlexW2048034622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.