ArticleWaste management (New York, N.Y.)2014
Changes in the microbial communities during co-composting of digestates.
Article in Waste management (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modular 4WD agricultural robot for cutting, collection, and precision seeding: design and simulation-based evaluation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effects of Two Different Proportions of Microbial Formulations on Microbial Communities in Kitchen Waste Composting.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Evaluation of bacterial diversity in a swine manure composting system contaminated with veterinary antibiotics (VAs).Archives of microbiology · 2023Article
- Effects of tea oil camellia (Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Isolation and Characterization of Beneficial Bacteria from Food Process Wastes.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Simultaneous biofiltration of HEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- One-time application of biochar influenced crop yield across three cropping cycles on tropical sandy loam soil in Ghana.Heliyon · 2021Article
- Microbes as vital additives for solid waste composting.Heliyon · 2020Review
- Article
- Characterization of bacterial community structure during in-vessel composting of agricultural waste by 16S rRNA sequencing.3 Biotech · 2018Article
- Fungal and bacterial successions in the process of co-composting of organic wastes as revealed by 454 pyrosequencing.PloS one · 2017Article
- An Overview of the Control of Bacterial Pathogens in Cattle Manure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016Review
- Persistence and Potential Viable but Non-culturable State of Pathogenic Bacteria during Storage of Digestates from Agricultural Biogas Plants.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- Metaproteomics reveals major microbial players and their biodegradation functions in a large-scale aerobic composting plant.Microbial biotechnology · 2015Article
- Fluorescence-based bioassays for the detection and evaluation of food materials.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anaerobic digestion is a waste treatment method which is of increasing interest worldwide. At the end of the process, a digestate remains, which can gain added value by being composted. A study was conducted in order to investigate microbial community dynamics during the composting process of a mixture of anaerobic digestate (derived from the anaerobic digestion of municipal food waste), green wastes and a screened compost (green waste/kitchen waste compost), using the COMPOCHIP microarray. The composting process showed a typical temperature development, and the highest degradation rates occurred during the first 14 days of composting, as seen from the elevated CO2 content in the exhaust air. With an exception of elevated nitrite and nitrate levels in the day 34 samples, physical-chemical parameters for all compost samples collected during the 63 day process indicated typical composting conditions. The microbial communities changed over the 63 days of composting. According to principal component analysis of the COMPOCHIP microarray results, compost samples from the start of the experiment were found to cluster most closely with the digestate and screened compost samples. The green waste samples were found to group separately. All starting materials investigated were found to yield fewer and lower signals when compared to the samples collected during the composting experiment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.