Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24456399›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2014

Individual differences in crossmodal brain activity predict arcuate fasciculus connectivity in developing readers.

Margaret M Gullick, James R Booth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. White matter integrity in medication-free women with peripartum depression: a tract-based spatial statistics study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret M GullickNorthwestern University.
James R Booth
Communication Disorders Technology (United States) · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Neural Development of Lexical ProcessingR01HD042049 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BOOTH, JAMES R · 2003 to 2012
$3.9M
Translational Research in Communication Sciences & DisordersT32DC009399 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI LARSON, CHARLES R · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Neural Development of Lexical ProcessingR56HD042049 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BOOTH, JAMES R. · 2007 to 2007
$436k
NICHD NIH HHS HD042049NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042049NICHD NIH HHS R56 HD042049NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC009399NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC009399-01A10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crossmodal integration of auditory and visual information, such as phonemes and graphemes, is a critical skill for fluent reading. Previous work has demonstrated that white matter connectivity along the arcuate fasciculus (AF) is predicted by reading skill and that crossmodal processing particularly activates the posterior STS (pSTS). However, the relationship between this crossmodal activation and white matter integrity has not been previously reported. We investigated the interrelationship of crossmodal integration, both in terms of behavioral performance and pSTS activity, with AF tract coherence using a rhyme judgment task in a group of 47 children with a range of reading abilities. We demonstrate that both response accuracy and pSTS activity for crossmodal (auditory-visual) rhyme judgments was predictive of fractional anisotropy along the left AF. Unimodal (auditory-only or visual-only) pSTS activity was not significantly related to AF connectivity. Furthermore, activity in other reading-related ROIs did not show the same AV-only AF coherence relationship, and AV pSTS activity was not related to connectivity along other language-related tracts. This study is the first to directly show that crossmodal brain activity is specifically related to connectivity in the AF, supporting its role in phoneme-grapheme integration ability. More generally, this study helps to define an interdependent neural network for reading-related integration.

Indexed as

IndividualityReadingAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAuditory PerceptionBrainBrain MappingChildFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOxygenPerforant PathwayOxygen

Identifiers

PMID24456399
PMCPMC4828929
OpenAlexW2099580492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.