Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24455146›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2013

Deceptive single-locus taxonomy and phylogeography: Wolbachia-associated divergence in mitochondrial DNA is not reflected in morphology and nuclear markers in a butterfly species.

Ullasa Kodandaramaiah, Thomas J Simonsen, Sean Bromilow, Niklas Wahlberg, Felix Sperling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Insects · 2020
    Article
  12. Spatial and temporal sex ratio bias andBiodiversity data journal · 2020
    Article
  13. Genomic evidence suggests further changes of butterfly names.The taxonomic report of the International Lepidoptera Survey · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Systematics ofZooKeys · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Ullasa KodandaramaiahSchool of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram, CET College campus Thiruvananthapuram, 695016, India ; Department of Zoology, Stockholm University 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Thomas J SimonsenDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, U.K ; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.
Sean BromilowDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.
Niklas WahlbergLaboratory of Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku 20014, Turku, Finland.
Felix SperlingDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAIndian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram · INUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The satyrine butterfly Coenonympha tullia (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) displays a deep split between two mitochondrial clades, one restricted to northern Alberta, Canada, and the other found throughout Alberta and across North America. We confirm this deep divide and test hypotheses explaining its phylogeographic structure. Neither genitalia morphology nor nuclear gene sequence supports cryptic species as an explanation, instead indicating differences between nuclear and mitochondrial genome histories. Sex-biased dispersal is unlikely to cause such mito-nuclear differences; however, selective sweeps by reproductive parasites could have led to this conflict. About half of the tested samples were infected by Wolbachia bacteria. Using multilocus strain typing for three Wolbachia genes, we show that the divergent mitochondrial clades are associated with two different Wolbachia strains, supporting the hypothesis that the mito-nuclear differences resulted from selection on the mitochondrial genome due to selective sweeps by Wolbachia strains.

Indexed as

Coenonympha californiaCoenonympha nipisiquitCoenonympha tulliacryptic diversityincipient speciesphylogeographyWolbachia.

Identifiers

PMID24455146
PMCPMC3892326
OpenAlexW2073908999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.