Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24455106›Full record

ArticleInfection ecology & epidemiology2014

Detection of antibodies against H5 and H7 strains in birds: evaluation of influenza pseudovirus particle neutralization tests.

Sofie Wallerström, Nina Lagerqvist, Nigel J Temperton, Michaela Cassmer, Ana Moreno, Malin Karlsson, Mikael Leijon, Ake Lundkvist, Kerstin I Falk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection ecology & epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sofie WallerströmKarolinska Institutet, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Stockholm, Sweden ; Swedish Institute for Communicable Disease Control, Department of Diagnostics and Vaccinology, Solna, Sweden.
Nina LagerqvistKarolinska Institutet, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Stockholm, Sweden ; Swedish Institute for Communicable Disease Control, Department of Diagnostics and Vaccinology, Solna, Sweden.
Nigel J TempertonViral Pseudotype Unit, University of Kent, Kent, UK.
Michaela CassmerSwedish Institute for Communicable Disease Control, Department of Diagnostics and Vaccinology, Solna, Sweden.
Ana MorenoReparto di Virologia, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia ed Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy.
Malin KarlssonSwedish Institute for Communicable Disease Control, Department of Diagnostics and Vaccinology, Solna, Sweden.
Mikael LeijonNational Veterinary Institute, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ake LundkvistKarolinska Institutet, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Stockholm, Sweden ; Swedish Institute for Communicable Disease Control, Department of Diagnostics and Vaccinology, Solna, Sweden ; Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kerstin I FalkKarolinska Institutet, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Stockholm, Sweden ; Swedish Institute for Communicable Disease Control, Department of Diagnostics and Vaccinology, Solna, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAvian influenza viruses circulate in bird populations, and it is important to maintain and uphold our knowledge of the viral strains that are currently of interest in this context. Here, we describe the use of hemagglutinin-pseudotype retroviruses based on highly pathogenic influenza viruses for the screening of avian sera for influenza A antibodies. Our aim was also to determine whether the pseudovirus neutralization tests that we assessed were sensitive and simple to use compared to the traditional methods, including hemagglutination inhibition assays and microneutralization tests. MATERIAL AND

methodsH5 and H7 pseudovirus neutralization tests were evaluated by using serum from infected rabbits. Subsequently, the assays were further investigated using a panel of serum samples from avian species. The panel contained samples that were seropositive for five different hemagglutinin subtypes as well as influenza A seronegative samples. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results suggest that the pseudovirus neutralization test is an alternative to hemagglutination inhibition assays, as we observed comparable titers to those of both standard microneutralizations assays as well as hemagglutinin inhibition assays. When evaluated by a panel of avian sera, the method also showed its capability to recognize antibodies directed toward low-pathogenic H5 and H7. Hence, we conclude that it is possible to use pseudoviruses based on highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses to screen avian sera for antibodies directed against influenza A subtypes H5 and H7.

Indexed as

antibodiesavianinfluenza Aneutralizationpseudovirus

Identifiers

PMID24455106
PMCPMC3895261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.