ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2013
Resident scholarship expectations and experiences: sources of uncertainty as barriers to success.
Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scholarly activity in Canadian Residency Matching Service criteria: do Canadian programs really care about applicant research?Canadian medical education journal · 2026Article
- Impact of a Scholarly Concentrations Program on Residents' Scholarly Output and Professional Identity Formation.Cureus · 2025Article
- Cultural Influences Catalyzing Resident Scholarly Productivity.Family medicine · 2023Article
- Resident Research Mentoring Teams: A Support Program to Increase Resident Research Productivity.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023Article
- "Not just a checkbox": A qualitative study of the resident scholarly experience.AEM education and training · 2022Article
- The content expert program: A structured approach to increase emergency medicine resident scholarly activity.AEM education and training · 2022Article
- Common Problematic Scholarly Activity Project Planning Expectations of Project Novices.Spartan medical research journal · 2021Article
- Building a Culture of Scholarship Within a Family Medicine Department: a Successful Eight-Year Journey of Incremental Interventions Following a Historical Perspective of Family Medicine Research.Medical science educator · 2021Article
- Mixed-methods evaluation of family medicine research training and peer mentorship in Lesotho.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Fostering global primary care research: a capacity-building approach.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- How do trainee doctors learn about research? Content analysis of Australian specialist colleges' intended research curricula.BMJ open · 2020Article
- A String of Pearls: Lessons for Medical Writing and Submitting for Publication.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2020Article
- Creating a collaborative peer writing group during residency.Medical education online · 2019Article
- Interventions to increase research publications in graduate medical education trainees: a systematic review.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2019Review
- Delivering the AAMC "Teaching for Quality" Program through a Community-Based GME Collaborative: Lessons Learned to Date.Spartan medical research journal · 2018Article
- The Statewide Campus System Scholarly Activity Developmental Planning Framework for Community-Based GME Leaders.Spartan medical research journal · 2018Article
- A Curriculum to Teach Learners How to Develop and Present a Case Report.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2018Article
- A dedicated scholarly research program in an adult and pediatric neurology residency program.Neurology · 2017Article
- Understanding Faculty and Trainee Needs Related to Scholarly Activity in a Large, Nonuniversity Graduate Medical Education Program.The Permanente journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScholarly activity during residency is vital to resident learning and ultimately to patient care. Incorporating that activity into training is, however, a challenge for medical educators. Most research on medical student and resident attitudes toward scholarly activity to date has been quantitative and has focused on level of interest, desire to perform scholarship, and perceived importance of scholarship.
objectiveWe explored attitudes, expectations, and barriers regarding participation in scholarly activity among current residents and graduates of a single family medicine residency program.
methodsUsing a phenomenologic approach, we systematically analyzed data from one-on-one, semistructured interviews with residents and graduates. Interviews included participant expectations and experiences with scholarly activity in residency.
resultsThe 20 participants (residents, 15 [75%]; residency graduates, 5 [25%]) identified uncertainty in their attitudes toward, and expectations regarding, participation in scholarly activity as an overarching theme, which may present a barrier to participation. Themes included uncertainty regarding their personal identity as a clinician, time to complete scholarly activity, how to establish a mentor-mentee relationship, the social norms of scholarship, what counted toward the scholarship requirements, the protocol for completing projects, and the clinical relevance of scholarship.
conclusionsUncertainty about scholarly activity expectations can add to learner anxiety and make performing scholarly activity during residency seem like an insurmountable task. Programs should consider implementing a variety of strategies to foster scholarly activity during residency, including clarifying and codifying expectations and facilitating mentoring relationships with faculty.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.