Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24454846›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Expression and replication studies to identify new candidate genes involved in normal hearing function.

Giorgia Girotto, Dragana Vuckovic, Annalisa Buniello, Beatriz Lorente-Cánovas, Morag Lewis, Paolo Gasparini, Karen P Steel

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pharmacologic Inhibition of JAK1/2 Potentiates Aminoglycoside-Induced Ototoxicity.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genes · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Giorgia GirottoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Dragana VuckovicDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Annalisa BunielloWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom ; Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College, London, United Kingdom.
Beatriz Lorente-CánovasWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom ; Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College, London, United Kingdom.
Morag LewisWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom ; Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College, London, United Kingdom.
Paolo GaspariniDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy ; Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.
Karen P SteelWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom ; Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBUniversity of Trieste · ITIRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0300212Medical Research Council MC_QA137918Telethon GGP09037Wellcome Trust 098051Wellcome Trust 100669Wellcome Trust WT100669MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable progress has been made in identifying deafness genes, but still little is known about the genetic basis of normal variation in hearing function. We recently carried out a Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) of quantitative hearing traits in southern European populations and found several SNPs with suggestive but none with significant association. In the current study, we followed up these SNPs to investigate which of them might show a genuine association with auditory function using alternative approaches. Firstly, we generated a shortlist of 19 genes from the published GWAS results. Secondly, we carried out immunocytochemistry to examine expression of these 19 genes in the mouse inner ear. Twelve of them showed distinctive cochlear expression patterns. Four showed expression restricted to sensory hair cells (Csmd1, Arsg, Slc16a6 and Gabrg3), one only in marginal cells of the stria vascularis (Dclk1) while the others (Ptprd, Grm8, GlyBP, Evi5, Rimbp2, Ank2, Cdh13) in multiple cochlear cell types. In the third step, we tested these 12 genes for replication of association in an independent set of samples from the Caucasus and Central Asia. Nine out of them showed nominally significant association (p<0.05). In particular, 4 were replicated at the same SNP and with the same effect direction while the remaining 5 showed a significant association in a gene-based test. Finally, to look for genotype-phenotype relationship, the audiometric profiles of the three genotypes of the most strongly associated gene variants were analyzed. Seven out of the 9 replicated genes (CDH13, GRM8, ANK2, SLC16A6, ARSG, RIMBP2 and DCLK1) showed an audiometric pattern with differences between different genotypes further supporting their role in hearing function. These data demonstrate the usefulness of this multistep approach in providing new insights into the molecular basis of hearing and may suggest new targets for treatment and prevention of hearing impairment.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationGene Expression ProfilingGenome-Wide Association StudyAdultAnimalsGenotypeHair Cells, AuditoryHearingHumansMicePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideStria Vascularis

Identifiers

PMID24454846
PMCPMC3891868
OpenAlexW2026182385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.