Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24454801›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Background synaptic activity in rat entorhinal cortex shows a progressively greater dominance of inhibition over excitation from deep to superficial layers.

Stuart David Greenhill, Sophie Elizabeth Lyn Chamberlain, Alex Lench, Peter Vernon Massey, Kathryn Heather Yuill, Gavin Lawrence Woodhall, Roland Spencer Gwynne Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stuart David GreenhillDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.
Sophie Elizabeth Lyn ChamberlainDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.
Alex LenchDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.
Peter Vernon MasseyDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.
Kathryn Heather YuillSchool of Biomedical & Healthcare Sciences, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Gavin Lawrence WoodhallAston Brain Centre, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Roland Spencer Gwynne JonesDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.
University of Bath · GBAston University · GBPeninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The entorhinal cortex (EC) controls hippocampal input and output, playing major roles in memory and spatial navigation. Different layers of the EC subserve different functions and a number of studies have compared properties of neurones across layers. We have studied synaptic inhibition and excitation in EC neurones, and we have previously compared spontaneous synaptic release of glutamate and GABA using patch clamp recordings of synaptic currents in principal neurones of layers II (L2) and V (L5). Here, we add comparative studies in layer III (L3). Such studies essentially look at neuronal activity from a presynaptic viewpoint. To correlate this with the postsynaptic consequences of spontaneous transmitter release, we have determined global postsynaptic conductances mediated by the two transmitters, using a method to estimate conductances from membrane potential fluctuations. We have previously presented some of this data for L3 and now extend to L2 and L5. Inhibition dominates excitation in all layers but the ratio follows a clear rank order (highest to lowest) of L2>L3>L5. The variance of the background conductances was markedly higher for excitation and inhibition in L2 compared to L3 or L5. We also show that induction of synchronized network epileptiform activity by blockade of GABA inhibition reveals a relative reluctance of L2 to participate in such activity. This was associated with maintenance of a dominant background inhibition in L2, whereas in L3 and L5 the absolute level of inhibition fell below that of excitation, coincident with the appearance of synchronized discharges. Further experiments identified potential roles for competition for bicuculline by ambient GABA at the GABAA receptor, and strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors in residual inhibition in L2. We discuss our results in terms of control of excitability in neuronal subpopulations of EC neurones and what these may suggest for their functional roles.

Indexed as

AnimalsEntorhinal Cortexgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidMalePatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsRats, WistarSynapsesSynaptic Transmissiongamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic Acid

Identifiers

PMID24454801
PMCPMC3893176
OpenAlexW2060874521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.