ArticlePloS one2014
Perceived impeding factors for return-to-work after long-term sickness absence due to major depressive disorder: a concept mapping approach.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Sustainable Return to Work: A Systematic Review Focusing on Personal and Social Factors.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2019Pooled it
- Prognostic factors for return to work of employees with common mental disorders: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Functional status and return to work in people with major depression: a 3-year national follow-up study.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2022Article
- Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: a modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Training on involving cognitions and perceptions in the occupational health management and work disability assessment of workers: development and evaluation.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Promoting Factors to Stay at Work Among Employees With Common Mental Health Problems: A Multiple-Stakeholder Concept Mapping Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Bandura's Self-Efficacy Model Used to Explore Participants' Experiences of Health, Lifestyle, and Work After Attending a Vocational Rehabilitation Program with Lifestyle Intervention - A Focus Group Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2021Article
- Do work- and home-related demands and resources differ between women and men during return-to-work? A focus group study among employees with common mental disorders.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Role of a Digital Return-To-Work Solution for Individuals With Common Mental Disorders: Qualitative Study of the Perspectives of Three Stakeholder Groups.JMIR formative research · 2020Article
- Stakeholders' Role and Actions in the Return-to-Work Process of Workers on Sick-Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Work-focused therapy for common mental disorders: A naturalistic study comparing an intervention group with a waitlist control group.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2020Article
- The Relationship Between Baseline Clinical Symptom Characteristics and Working Ability in Japanese Patients Treated for Major Depressive Disorder and Painful Physical Symptoms.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2020Article
- Work Participation Among Employees with Common Mental Disorders: A Meta-synthesis.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2018Review
- How Can Supervisors Contribute to the Return to Work of Employees Who have Experienced Depression?Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2018Article
- Article
- A concept mapping study evaluating the UK's first NHS generic fatigue clinic.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016Article
- Helpful Factors in the Treatment of Depression from the Patient's, Carer's and Professional's Perspective: A Concept Map Study.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of the present study was to explore various stakeholder perspectives regarding factors that impede return-to-work (RTW) after long-term sickness absence related to major depressive disorder (MDD).
methodsConcept mapping was used to explore employees', supervisors' and occupational physicians' perspectives on these impeding factors.
resultsNine perceived themes, grouped in three meta-clusters were found that might impede RTW: Person, (personality / coping problems, symptoms of depression and comorbid (health) problems, employee feels misunderstood, and resuming work too soon), Work (troublesome work situation, too little support at work, and too little guidance at work) and Healthcare (insufficient mental healthcare and insufficient care from occupational physician). All stakeholders regarded personality/coping problems and symptoms of depression as the most important impeding theme. In addition, supervisors emphasized the importance of mental healthcare underestimating the importance of the work environment, while occupational physicians stressed the importance of the lack of safety and support in the work environment.
conclusionsIn addition to the reduction of symptoms, more attention is needed on coping with depressive symptoms and personality problems in the work environment support in the work environment and for RTW in mental healthcare, to prevent long term sickness absence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.