ArticleBiomicrofluidics2013
Life under flow: A novel microfluidic device for the assessment of anti-biofilm technologies.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of the dual scale surface topography of a surface-modified titanium alloy on its bactericidal activity againstRSC advances · 2025Article
- Preferential adhesion of bacterial cells onto top- and bottom-mounted nanostructured surfaces under flow conditions.Nanoscale advances · 2023Article
- Multichannel Microfluidic Platform for Temporal-Spatial Investigation of Niche Roles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli within a Dual-Species Biofilm.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Development of Antifouling Strategies for Marine Applications.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Article
- Early biofilm and streamer formation is mediated by wall shear stress and surface wettability: A multifactorial microfluidic study.MicrobiologyOpen · 2022Article
- Bactericidal efficiency of micro- and nanostructured surfaces: a critical perspective.RSC advances · 2021Review
- Review
- A microfluidic platform for in situ investigation of biofilm formation and its treatment under controlled conditions.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2020Article
- Ultrasound-mediated therapies for the treatment of biofilms in chronic wounds: a review of present knowledge.Microbial biotechnology · 2020Review
- The Flagellar Gene Regulates Biofilm Formation and Mussel Larval Settlement and Metamorphosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Monitoring bacterial biofilms with a microfluidic flow chip designed for imaging with white-light interferometry.Biomicrofluidics · 2017Article
- Role of force-sensitive amyloid-like interactions in fungal catch bonding and biofilms.Eukaryotic cell · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the current study, we have developed and fabricated a novel lab-on-a-chip device for the investigation of biofilm responses, such as attachment kinetics and initial biofilm formation, to different hydrodynamic conditions. The microfluidic flow channels are designed using computational fluid dynamic simulations so as to have a pre-defined, homogeneous wall shear stress in the channels, ranging from 0.03 to 4.30 Pa, which are relevant to in-service conditions on a ship hull, as well as other man-made marine platforms. Temporal variations of biofilm formation in the microfluidic device were assessed using time-lapse microscopy, nucleic acid staining, and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Differences in attachment kinetics were observed with increasing shear stress, i.e., with increasing shear stress there appeared to be a delay in bacterial attachment, i.e., at 55, 120, 150, and 155 min for 0.03, 0.60, 2.15, and 4.30 Pa, respectively. CLSM confirmed marked variations in colony architecture, i.e.,: (i) lower shear stresses resulted in biofilms with distinctive morphologies mainly characterised by mushroom-like structures, interstitial channels, and internal voids, and (ii) for the higher shear stresses compact clusters with large interspaces between them were formed. The key advantage of the developed microfluidic device is the combination of three architectural features in one device, i.e., an open-system design, channel replication, and multiple fully developed shear stresses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.