Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24454377›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of biomaterials2013

Bone substitutes for peri-implant defects of postextraction implants.

Pâmela Letícia Santos, Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli, Cristino da Silva Telles, Walter Betoni Júnior, Roberta Okamoto, Vivian Chiacchio Buchignani, Thallita Pereira Queiroz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of biomaterials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pâmela Letícia SantosDepartment of Oral Biology Postgraduation, Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Jéssica Lemos GulinelliDepartment of Oral Biology Postgraduation, Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Cristino da Silva TellesSchool of Implantology of Cuiaba, Brazil.
Walter Betoni JúniorSchool of Implantology of Cuiaba, Brazil.
Roberta OkamotoDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry of Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Vivian Chiacchio BuchignaniDepartment of Oral Biology Postgraduation, Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC), Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Thallita Pereira QueirozDepartment of Health Sciences, Implantology Post Graduation Course, Dental School, University Center of Araraquara, UNIARA, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Sagrado Coração · BRUniversidade de Cuiabá · BRCentro Universitário de Araraquara · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Placement of implants in fresh sockets is an alternative to try to reduce physiological resorption of alveolar ridge after tooth extraction. This surgery can be used to preserve the bone architecture and also accelerate the restorative procedure. However, the diastasis observed between bone and implant may influence osseointegration. So, autogenous bone graft and/or biomaterials have been used to fill this gap. Considering the importance of bone repair for treatment with implants placed immediately after tooth extraction, this study aimed to present a literature review about biomaterials surrounding immediate dental implants. The search included 56 articles published from 1969 to 2012. The results were based on data analysis and discussion. It was observed that implant fixation immediately after extraction is a reliable alternative to reduce the treatment length of prosthetic restoration. In general, the biomaterial should be used to increase bone/implant contact and enhance osseointegration.

Identifiers

PMID24454377
PMCPMC3876702
OpenAlexW1984447240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.