Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24454335›Full record

ArticlePPAR research2013

Effects of PPAR γ Agonist Pioglitazone on Redox-Sensitive Cellular Signaling in Young Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats.

Ima Dovinová, Miroslav Barancik, Miroslava Majzunova, Stefan Zorad, Lucia Gajdosechová, Linda Gresová, Sona Cacanyiova, Frantisek Kristek, Peter Balis, Julie Y H Chan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PPAR research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ima DovinováInstitute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, SAS, Sienkiewiczova 1, 813 71 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Miroslav BarancikInstitute for Heart Research, SAS, Dubravska cesta 9, 840 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Miroslava MajzunovaInstitute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, SAS, Sienkiewiczova 1, 813 71 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Stefan ZoradInstitute of Experimental Endocrinology, SAS, Vlarska 3, 833 06 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Lucia GajdosechováInstitute of Experimental Endocrinology, SAS, Vlarska 3, 833 06 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Linda GresováInstitute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, SAS, Sienkiewiczova 1, 813 71 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Sona CacanyiovaInstitute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, SAS, Sienkiewiczova 1, 813 71 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Frantisek KristekInstitute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, SAS, Sienkiewiczova 1, 813 71 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Peter BalisInstitute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, SAS, Sienkiewiczova 1, 813 71 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Julie Y H ChanCenter for Translational Research in Biomedical Science, Kaohsiung Chang Gang Memorial Hospital, 123 Ta Pei Road, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan.
Institute of Normal and Pathological Physiology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKInstitute of Experimental Endocrinology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PPAR γ receptor plays an important role in oxidative stress response. Its agonists can influence vascular contractility in experimental hypertension. Our study was focused on the effects of a PPAR γ agonist pioglitazone (PIO) on blood pressure regulation, vasoactivity of vessels, and redox-sensitive signaling at the central (brainstem, BS) and peripheral (left ventricle, LV) levels in young prehypertensive rats. 5-week-old SHR were treated either with PIO (10 mg/kg/day, 2 weeks) or with saline using gastric gavage. Administration of PIO significantly slowed down blood pressure increase and improved lipid profile and aortic relaxation after insulin stimulation. A significant increase in PPAR γ expression was found only in BS, not in LV. PIO treatment did not influence NOS changes, but had tissue-dependent effect on SOD regulation and increased SOD activity, observed in LV. The treatment with PIO differentially affected also the levels of other intracellular signaling components: Akt kinase increased in the the BS, while β -catenin level was down-regulated in the BS and up-regulated in the LV. We found that the lowering of blood pressure in young SHR can be connected with insulin sensitivity of vessels and that β -catenin and SOD levels are important agents mediating PIO effects in the BS and LV.

Identifiers

PMID24454335
PMCPMC3880766
OpenAlexW2006185072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.