Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24453746›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of MS care2012

Assessing relapses and response to relapse treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis: a nursing perspective.

Amy Perrin Ross, June Halper, Colleen J Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of MS care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessment and Treatment Strategies for a Multiple Sclerosis Relapse.Journal of immunology and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Therapeutic management of severe relapses in multiple sclerosis.Current treatment options in neurology · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy Perrin RossDepartment of Neurosciences, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (APR); Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, Hackensack, NJ, USA (JH); and Department of Clinical Neurosciences-Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada (CJH).
June HalperDepartment of Neurosciences, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (APR); Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, Hackensack, NJ, USA (JH); and Department of Clinical Neurosciences-Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada (CJH).
Colleen J HarrisDepartment of Neurosciences, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA (APR); Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, Hackensack, NJ, USA (JH); and Department of Clinical Neurosciences-Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada (CJH).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are currently no assessment tools that focus on evaluating patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who are experiencing a relapse or that evaluate patients' response to acute relapse treatment. In practice, assessments are often subjective, potentially resulting in overlooked symptoms, unaddressed patient concerns, unnoticed or underrecognized side effects of therapies (both disease modifying and symptomatic), and suboptimal therapeutic response. Systematic evaluation of specific symptoms and potential side effects can minimize the likelihood of overlooking important information. However, given the number of potential symptoms and adverse events that patients may experience, an exhaustive evaluation can be time-consuming. Clinicians are thus challenged to balance thoroughness with brevity. A need exists for a brief but comprehensive objective assessment tool that can be used in practice to 1) help clinicians assess patients when they present with symptoms of a relapse, and 2) evaluate outcomes of acute management. A working group of expert nurses convened to discuss recognition and management of relapses. In this article, we review data related to recognition and management of relapses, discuss practical challenges, and describe the development of an assessment questionnaire that evaluates relapse symptoms, the impact of symptoms on the patient, and the effectiveness and tolerability of acute treatment. The questionnaire is designed to be appropriate for use in MS specialty clinics, general neurology practices, or other practice settings and can be administered by nurses, physicians, other clinicians, or patients (self-evaluation). The relapse assessment questionnaire is currently being piloted in a number of practice settings.

Identifiers

PMID24453746
PMCPMC3882990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.