Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24453728›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of MS care2012

Adherence to first-line disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis in kuwait.

Raed Alroughani, Anil Thussu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of MS care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raed AlroughaniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Anil ThussuDepartment of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the rate of nonadherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) among multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in Kuwait and to identify reasons for patient discontinuation of long-term therapy. Using a newly established MS registry at our institution, we collected data on MS patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, disability measures, and continuation or discontinuation of first-line DMTs. Reasons for nonadherence were divided into four categories: adverse events, inconvenience, perceived lack of efficacy, and physician-documented disease progression. Of 212 eligible patients, 40.1% were found to be nonadherent to first-line DMTs. In the nonadherent group, the female-to-male ratio was 1.75:1 and the mean age at disease onset was 26.8 years. Of this group, 69.4% of patients had a relapsing-remitting course, 18.8% had a secondary progressive course, and 11.8% had clinically isolated syndrome. Compared with the adherent group, the nonadherent group had a shorter mean disease duration (P = .014) and a greater likelihood of having Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores of 3 or lower (67.1% vs. 48.0%; P = .007). Inconvenience was the most common reason for nonadherence (32.9%), followed by perceived lack of efficacy (25.9%), adverse events (23.5%), and physician-documented disease progression (17.7%). In summary, the rate of nonadherence to first-line DMTs in MS patients at our institution is considered high. Most nonadherent patients had a short disease duration and low EDSS scores. Inconvenience and perceived lack of efficacy were the most common reasons for nonadherence. The results demonstrate a need to improve treatment adherence among MS patients in Kuwait through providing better patient education, improving communication between patients and health-care providers, defining therapy expectations, and instituting new therapeutic techniques.

Identifiers

PMID24453728
PMCPMC3882977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.