Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24453568›Full record

ReviewZooKeys2013

Reviewing population studies for forensic purposes: Dog mitochondrial DNA.

Sophie Verscheure, Thierry Backeljau, Stijn Desmyter

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ZooKeys, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mitochondrial Control Region Database of Hungarian Fallow Deer (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie VerscheureNational Institute of Criminalistics and Criminology, Vilvoordsesteenweg 100, B-1120, Brussels, Belgium ; University of Antwerp (Evolutionary Ecology Group), Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium.
Thierry BackeljauUniversity of Antwerp (Evolutionary Ecology Group), Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium ; Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (OD "Taxonomy and Phylogeny" and JEMU), Vautierstraat 29, B-1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Stijn DesmyterNational Institute of Criminalistics and Criminology, Vilvoordsesteenweg 100, B-1120, Brussels, Belgium.
Institut National de Criminalistique et de Criminologie · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of dog hair through mtDNA analysis has become increasingly important in the last 15 years, as it can provide associative evidence connecting victims and suspects. The evidential value of an mtDNA match between dog hair and its potential donor is determined by the random match probability of the haplotype. This probability is based on the haplotype's population frequency estimate. Consequently, implementing a population study representative of the population relevant to the forensic case is vital to the correct evaluation of the evidence. This paper reviews numerous published dog mtDNA studies and shows that many of these studies vary widely in sampling strategies and data quality. Therefore, several features influencing the representativeness of a population sample are discussed. Moreover, recommendations are provided on how to set up a dog mtDNA population study and how to decide whether or not to include published data. This review emphasizes the need for improved dog mtDNA population data for forensic purposes, including targeting the entire mitochondrial genome. In particular, the creation of a publicly available database of qualitative dog mtDNA population studies would improve the genetic analysis of dog traces in forensic casework.

Indexed as

DogForensicsMitochondrial DNAPopulation studyRandom match probabilitySampling strategy

Identifiers

PMID24453568
PMCPMC3890688
OpenAlexW2047397067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.