Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24453558›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2013

DNA barcoding as a complementary tool for conservation and valorisation of forest resources.

Angeliki Laiou, Luca Aconiti Mandolini, Roberta Piredda, Rosanna Bellarosa, Marco Cosimo Simeone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DNA barcoding and genetic fidelity assessment of micropropagatedPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The changing epitome of species identification - DNA barcoding.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angeliki LaiouDepartment of Agriculture, Forests, Nature and Energy (DAFNE) - Università degli Studi della Tuscia, via S. Camillo de' Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.
Luca Aconiti MandoliniDepartment of Agriculture, Forests, Nature and Energy (DAFNE) - Università degli Studi della Tuscia, via S. Camillo de' Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.
Roberta PireddaDepartment of Agriculture, Forests, Nature and Energy (DAFNE) - Università degli Studi della Tuscia, via S. Camillo de' Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.
Rosanna BellarosaDepartment of Agriculture, Forests, Nature and Energy (DAFNE) - Università degli Studi della Tuscia, via S. Camillo de' Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.
Marco Cosimo SimeoneDepartment of Agriculture, Forests, Nature and Energy (DAFNE) - Università degli Studi della Tuscia, via S. Camillo de' Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the pre-historic era, humans have been using forests as a food, drugs and handcraft reservoir. Today, the use of botanical raw material to produce pharmaceuticals, herbal remedies, teas, spirits, cosmetics, sweets, dietary supplements, special industrial compounds and crude materials constitute an important global resource in terms of healthcare and economy. In recent years, DNA barcoding has been suggested as a useful molecular technique to complement traditional taxonomic expertise for fast species identification and biodiversity inventories. In this study, in situ application of DNA barcodes was tested on a selected group of forest tree species with the aim of contributing to the identification, conservation and trade control of these valuable plant resources. The "core barcode" for land plants (rbcL, matK, and trnH-psbA) was tested on 68 tree specimens (24 taxa). Universality of the method, ease of data retrieval and correct species assignment using sequence character states, presence of DNA barcoding gaps and GenBank discrimination assessment were evaluated. The markers showed different prospects of reliable applicability. RbcL and trnH-psbA displayed 100% amplification and sequencing success, while matK did not amplify in some plant groups. The majority of species had a single haplotype. The trnH-psbA region showed the highest genetic variability, but in most cases the high intraspecific sequence divergence revealed the absence of a clear DNA barcoding gap. We also faced an important limitation because the taxonomic coverage of the public reference database is incomplete. Overall, species identification success was 66.7%. This work illustrates current limitations in the applicability of DNA barcoding to taxonomic forest surveys. These difficulties urge for an improvement of technical protocols and an increase of the number of sequences and taxa in public databases.

Indexed as

ConservationDNA barcodingForest BiodiversityMedicinal and Aromatic plants

Identifiers

PMID24453558
PMCPMC3890678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.