ArticleZooKeys2013
Applications of DNA barcoding to fish landings: authentication and diversity assessment.
Article in ZooKeys, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plastome evolution and phylogenomic relationships in Ajuga (Lamiaceae, Ajugoideae).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Building a DNA barcode library of commercially exploited fish genetic resources (FGR) of the Gomti River, Ganga basin, implications for conservation and management.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- DNA barcoding for the assessment of marine and coastal fish diversity from the Coast of Mozambique.PloS one · 2024Article
- Genetic identification of three CITES-listed sharks using a paper-based Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC).PloS one · 2024Article
- Molecular characterization of juvenile fish from the Amazon estuary using DNA barcoding approach.PloS one · 2023Article
- Diversification of Dawkinsia filamentosa (Valenciennes, 1844) and their growth conditions by the impact of toxic metals in the river Tamiraparani.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2021Article
- Characterizing Industrial and Artisanal Fishing Vessel Catch Composition Using Environmental DNA and Satellite-Based Tracking Data.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- DNA barcoding to characterize biodiversity of freshwater fishes of Egypt.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- Biodiversity inventory of the grey mullets (Actinopterygii: Mugilidae) of the Indo-Australian Archipelago through the iterative use of DNA-based species delimitation and specimen assignment methods.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
- Article
- Hidden diversity in Prochilodus nigricans: A new genetic lineage within the Tapajós River basin.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
- Evaluating freshwater macroinvertebrates from eDNA metabarcoding: A river Nalón case study.PloS one · 2018Article
- FishTrace: a genetic catalogue of European fishes.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017Article
- DNA barcoding reveals the mislabeling of fish in a popular tourist destination in Brazil.PeerJ · 2017Article
- DNA in a bottle-Rapid metabarcoding survey for early alerts of invasive species in ports.PloS one · 2017Article
- Role of DNA barcoding in marine biodiversity assessment and conservation: An update.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2016Review
- Towards a Universal Approach Based on Omics Technologies for the Quality Control of Food.BioMed research international · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA barcoding methodologies are being increasingly applied not only for scientific purposes but also for diverse real-life uses. Fisheries assessment is a potential niche for DNA barcoding, which serves for species authentication and may also be used for estimating within-population genetic diversity of exploited fish. Analysis of single-sequence barcodes has been proposed as a shortcut for measuring diversity in addition to the original purpose of species identification. Here we explore the relative utility of different mitochondrial sequences (12S rDNA, COI, cyt b, and D-Loop) for application as barcodes in fisheries sciences, using as case studies two marine and two freshwater catches of contrasting diversity levels. Ambiguous catch identification from COI and cyt b was observed. In some cases this could be attributed to duplicated names in databases, but in others it could be due to mitochondrial introgression between closely related species that may obscure species assignation from mtDNA. This last problem could be solved using a combination of mitochondrial and nuclear genes. We suggest to simultaneously analyze one conserved and one more polymorphic gene to identify species and assess diversity in fish catches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.