Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24453341›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

p140Cap regulates memory and synaptic plasticity through Src-mediated and citron-N-mediated actin reorganization.

Daniele Repetto, Paola Camera, Riccardo Melani, Noemi Morello, Isabella Russo, Eleonora Calcagno, Romana Tomasoni, Federico Bianchi, Gaia Berto, Maurizio Giustetto and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. TheFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. p140Cap Controls Female Fertility in Mice ActingFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Daniele RepettoMolecular Biotechnology Center, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Department of Neuroscience, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy, Institute of Neuroscience of the National Research Council of Italy, 56124 Pisa, Italy, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (Neurofarba), University of Florence, 50135 Florence, Italy, National Institute of Neuroscience-Italy, 10125 Torino, Italy, Department of Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, and Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy, and Institute of Anatomy and Molecular Neurobiology, Westfälische Wilhelms-University, D-48149 Münster, Germany.
Paola Camera
Riccardo Melani
Noemi Morello
Isabella Russo
Eleonora Calcagno
Romana Tomasoni
Federico Bianchi
Gaia Berto
Maurizio Giustetto
Nicoletta Berardi
Tommaso Pizzorusso
Michela Matteoli
Paola Di Stefano
Markus Missler
Emilia Turco
Ferdinando Di Cunto
Paola Defilippi

Funding

Telethon GGP12095Telethon GGP13081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge in the neuroscience field is the identification of molecules and pathways that control synaptic plasticity and memory. Dendritic spines play a pivotal role in these processes, as the major sites of excitatory synapses in neuronal communication. Previous studies have shown that the scaffold protein p140Cap localizes into dendritic spines and that its knockdown negatively modulates spine shape in culture. However, so far, there is no information on its in vivo relevance. By using a knock-out mouse model, we here demonstrate that p140Cap is a key element for both learning and synaptic plasticity. Indeed, p140Cap(-/-) mice are impaired in object recognition test, as well as in LTP and in LTD measurements. The in vivo effects of p140Cap loss are presumably attenuated by noncell-autonomous events, since primary neurons obtained from p140Cap(-/-) mice show a strong reduction in number of mushroom spines and abnormal organization of synapse-associated F-actin. These phenotypes are most likely caused by a local reduction of the inhibitory control of RhoA and of cortactin toward the actin-depolymerizing factor cofilin. These events can be controlled by p140Cap through its capability to directly inhibit the activation of Src kinase and by its binding to the scaffold protein Citron-N. Altogether, our results provide new insight into how protein associated with dynamic microtubules may regulate spine actin organization through interaction with postsynaptic density components.

Indexed as

ActinsAdaptor Proteins, Vesicular TransportAnimalsBlotting, WesternDendritic SpinesExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHippocampusIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLearningMemoryMiceMice, KnockoutNeuronal PlasticityPatch-Clamp TechniquesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesActinsAdaptor Proteins, Vesicular Transportcitron-kinaseIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine Kinasessrc-Family KinasesSrcin1 protein, ratactin cytoskeletonCit-Np140CapRho GTPaseSrcsynapses

Identifiers

PMID24453341
PMCPMC6705312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.