Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24453305›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

A hierarchy of responses to auditory regularities in the macaque brain.

Lynn Uhrig, Stanislas Dehaene, Béchir Jarraya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Somatosensory Mismatch Negativity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Different Subregions of Monkey Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Respond to Abstract Sequences and Their Components.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Propofol-mediated loss of consciousness disrupts predictive routing and local field phase modulation of neural activity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lynn UhrigCEA, NeuroSpin Center, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Avenir Bettencourt-Schueller, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U992, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, CEA, I2BM, NeuroSpin, Unité de Recherche en NeuroImagerie Applicative Clinique et Translationnelle (UNIACT), 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, Collège de France, 75231 Paris, France, Université Paris Sud, 91405 Orsay, France, Neuromodulation Unit, Deptartment of Neurosurgery, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France, and Université Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, 78000 Versailles, France.
Stanislas Dehaene
Béchir Jarraya

Funding

European Research Council 249830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Can monkeys learn simple auditory sequences and detect when a new sequence deviates from the stored pattern? Here we tested the predictive-coding hypothesis, which postulates that cortical areas encode internal models of sensory sequences at multiple hierarchical levels, and use these predictive models to detect deviant stimuli. In humans, hierarchical predictive coding has been supported by studies of auditory sequence processing, but it is unclear whether internal hierarchical models of auditory sequences are also available to nonhuman animals. Using fMRI, we evaluated the encoding of auditory regularities in awake monkeys listening to first- and second-order sequence violations. We observed distinct fMRI responses to first-order violations in auditory cortex and to second-order violations in a frontoparietal network, a distinction only demonstrated in conscious humans so far. The results indicate that the capacity to represent and predict the structure of auditory sequences is shared by humans and nonhuman primates.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleLearningMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalefMRInonhuman primatepredictive coding

Identifiers

PMID24453305
PMCPMC5635960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.