SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Amnioinfusion for meconium-stained liquor in labour.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meconium-stained amniotic fluid.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Pooled it
- Amnioinfusion for chorioamnionitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Surfactant therapy and antibiotics in neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016Pooled it
- Antibiotics for meconium-stained amniotic fluid in labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Amnioinfusion for third trimester preterm premature rupture of membranes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Prediction Performance of Earlier Studies for Later Studies in Cochrane Reviews.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Meconium aspiration syndrome: from pathophysiology to treatment.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Cesarean Section Among all Deliveries in a Tertiary Care Centre of Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2021Article
- Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Review
- Indications and determinants of caesarean section delivery: Evidence from a population-based study in Matlab, Bangladesh.PloS one · 2017Article
- Current Concepts in the Management of Meconium Aspiration Syndrome.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2016Review
- Meconium aspiration syndrome: a role for fetal systemic inflammation.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmnioinfusion is thought to dilute meconium present in the amniotic fluid and so reduce the risk of meconium aspiration.
objectivesTo assess the effects of amnioinfusion for meconium-stained liquor on perinatal outcome. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (1 December 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing amnioinfusion with no amnioinfusion for women in labour with moderate or thick meconium staining of the amniotic fluid. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently assessed eligibility and trial quality, and extracted data. MAIN
resultsFourteen studies of variable quality (4435 women) are included.Subgroup analysis was performed for studies from settings with limited facilities to monitor the baby's condition during labour and intervene effectively, and settings with standard peripartum surveillance.Settings with standard peripartum surveillance: there was considerable heterogeneity for several outcomes. There was no significant reduction in the primary outcomes meconium aspiration syndrome, perinatal death or severe morbidity, and maternal death or severe morbidity. There was a reduction in caesarean sections (CSs) for fetal distress but not overall. Meconium below the vocal cords diagnosed by laryngoscopy was reduced, as was neonatal ventilation or neonatal intensive care unit admission, but there was no significant reduction in perinatal deaths or other morbidity. Planned sensitivity analysis excluding trials with greater risk of bias resulted in an absence of benefits for any of the outcomes studied.Settings with limited peripartum surveillance: three studies were included. In the amnioinfusion group there was a reduction in CS for fetal distress and overall; meconium aspiration syndrome (three studies, 1144 women; risk ratio (RR) 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.52); perinatal mortality (three studies, 1151 women; RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.53) and neonatal ventilation or neonatal intensive care unit admission. In one of the studies, meconium below the vocal cords was reduced and, in the other, neonatal encephalopathy was reduced. AUTHORS'
conclusionsAmnioinfusion is associated with substantive improvements in perinatal outcome only in settings where facilities for perinatal surveillance are limited. It is not clear whether the benefits are due to dilution of meconium or relief of oligohydramnios.In settings with standard peripartum surveillance, some non-substantive outcomes were improved in the initial analysis, but sensitivity analysis excluding trials with greater risk of bias eliminated these differences. Amnioinfusion is either ineffective in this setting, or its effects are masked by other strategies to optimise neonatal outcome.The trials reviewed are too small to address the possibility of rare but serious maternal adverse effects of amnioinfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.