Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24452879›Full record

ReviewDrugs2014

Oxycodone/Naloxone prolonged-release: a review of its use in the management of chronic pain while counteracting opioid-induced constipation.

Celeste B Burness, Gillian M Keating

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Opioid system and related ligands: from the past to future perspectives.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Opioid Analgesia and Opioid-Induced Adverse Effects: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Opioids in Gastroenterology: Treating Adverse Effects and Creating Therapeutic Benefits.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Celeste B BurnessAdis, 41 Centorian Drive, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, North Shore 0754, Auckland, New Zealand, demail@springer.com.
Gillian M Keating
North Shore Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A combination of prolonged-release (PR) oxycodone with PR naloxone (Targin(®), Targiniq(®), Targinact(®)) in one tablet with a fixed 2:1 ratio is available for the treatment of patients with severe pain, which can only be adequately managed with opioid analgesics. The aim of this formulation is to counteract opioid-induced constipation through the local antagonist effect of naloxone in the gut wall, while maintaining analgesia due to the low bioavailability of oral naloxone. Three large, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, phase III trials in patients with moderate to severe, chronic, non-malignant pain, plus a prospectively planned pooled analysis of two of these studies, demonstrated that oxycodone/naloxone PR improved bowel function, as measured by the bowel function index, compared with oxycodone PR. Additionally, oxycodone/naloxone PR relieved pain more effectively than placebo and no less effectively than oxycodone PR after 12 weeks. Phase II efficacy data in cancer patients are consistent with those observed in patients with non-malignant pain. Oxycodone/naloxone PR was generally well tolerated; the most frequently reported adverse events were of gastrointestinal origin, consistent with those known to occur with opioid therapy. Of note, numerically lower rates of constipation were observed in the oxycodone/naloxone PR group compared with the oxycodone PR group. A cost-utility analysis predicted that oxycodone/naloxone PR would be a cost-effective option compared with oxycodone PR in patients with non-malignant pain. Although more comparative data are needed, oxycodone/naloxone PR is an effective option for use in patients with severe chronic pain, particularly among those with opioid-induced constipation.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidChronic PainConstipationDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CombinationsDrug InteractionsHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersOxycodoneQuality of LifeAnalgesics, OpioidDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CombinationsNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOxycodone

Identifiers

PMID24452879
OpenAlexW2082276527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.