Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24452801›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2014

Transcriptome-wide investigation of genomic imprinting in chicken.

Laure Frésard, Sophie Leroux, Bertrand Servin, David Gourichon, Patrice Dehais, Magali San Cristobal, Nathalie Marsaud, Florence Vignoles, Bertrand Bed'hom, Jean-Luc Coville and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Building Haplotype-Resolved 3D Genome Maps of Chicken Skeletal Muscle.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Livestock species as emerging models for genomic imprinting.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Zygotic genome activation in the chicken: a comparative review.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laure FrésardINRA, UMR444 Laboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire, Castanet-Tolosan F-31326, France, ENVT, UMR444 Laboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire, Toulouse F-31076, France, INRA, PEAT Pôle d'Expérimentation Avicole de Tours, Nouzilly F- 37380, France, INRA, Sigenae UR875 Biométrie et Intelligence Artificielle, Castanet-Tolosan F-31326, France, INRA, GeT-PlaGe Genotoul, Castanet-Tolosan F-31326, France, INRA, UMR1313 Génétique animale et biologie intégrative, Jouy en Josas F-78350, France, AgroParisTech, UMR1313 Génétique animale et biologie intégrative, Jouy en Josas F-78350, France, Department of Computer Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA, INRA, UR83 Recherche Avicoles, Nouzilly F- 37380, France and Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Élevage, Animal Genetics Laboratory, Rennes F-35000, France.
Sophie Leroux
Bertrand Servin
David Gourichon
Patrice Dehais
Magali San Cristobal
Nathalie Marsaud
Florence Vignoles
Bertrand Bed'hom
Jean-Luc Coville
Farhad Hormozdiari
Catherine Beaumont
Tatiana Zerjal
Alain Vignal
Mireille Morisson
Sandrine Lagarrigue
Frédérique Pitel
Physiologie Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage · FRAgroParisTech · FRLaboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism by which alleles of some specific genes are expressed in a parent-of-origin manner. It has been observed in mammals and marsupials, but not in birds. Until now, only a few genes orthologous to mammalian imprinted ones have been analyzed in chicken and did not demonstrate any evidence of imprinting in this species. However, several published observations such as imprinted-like QTL in poultry or reciprocal effects keep the question open. Our main objective was thus to screen the entire chicken genome for parental-allele-specific differential expression on whole embryonic transcriptomes, using high-throughput sequencing. To identify the parental origin of each observed haplotype, two chicken experimental populations were used, as inbred and as genetically distant as possible. Two families were produced from two reciprocal crosses. Transcripts from 20 embryos were sequenced using NGS technology, producing ∼200 Gb of sequences. This allowed the detection of 79 potentially imprinted SNPs, through an analysis method that we validated by detecting imprinting from mouse data already published. However, out of 23 candidates tested by pyrosequencing, none could be confirmed. These results come together, without a priori, with previous statements and phylogenetic considerations assessing the absence of genomic imprinting in chicken.

Indexed as

Genomic ImprintingTranscriptomeAnimalsChick EmbryoChickensFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleMiceMice, Inbred DBAPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID24452801
PMCPMC3973300
OpenAlexW2137784215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.