Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24452323›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2014

Effect of opening middle-ear cavity on vibrations of gerbil tympanic membrane.

Nima Maftoon, W Robert J Funnell, Sam J Daniel, Willem F Decraemer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acoustical Effects of Tympanostomy Tube Attachment to Human Tympanic Membrane.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Increasing the reliability of real-time electrocochleography during cochlear implantation: a standardized guideline.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Vibration Measurements of the Gerbil Eardrum Under Quasi-static Pressure Steps.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020
    Article
  6. Tympanic Resonance Hypothesis.Frontiers in neurology · 2020
    Article
  7. Tympanic membrane surface motions in forward and reverse middle ear transmissions.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Finite-Element Modelling of the Response of the Gerbil Middle Ear to Sound.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nima MaftoonDepartment of BioMedical Engineering, McGill University, 3775, rue University, Montreal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.
W Robert J Funnell
Sam J Daniel
Willem F Decraemer
McGill University · CAUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents in vivo experimental measurements of vibrations on the pars flaccida, along the manubrium and at several points on the pars tensa in the gerbil with open middle-ear cavity. The effects of progressive opening of the middle-ear cavity are presented, with up to five different extents of opening. In all manubrial, pars-tensa and pars-flaccida responses, opening the cavity causes an increase in the low-frequency magnitude and a shift of the main middle-ear resonance to lower frequencies and introduces an antiresonance. However, opening the cavity has little or no effect on either the mode of vibration of the manubrium or the breakup frequency of the pars tensa. When the opening is gradually widened, the antiresonance frequency moves to higher frequencies. When the opening is made as wide as anatomically possible, the antiresonance moves to almost 10 kHz. The main increase in the low-frequency response magnitude happens upon making the smallest hole in the cavity wall, and further progressive enlarging of the opening has little or no effect on the low-frequency magnitude. The antiresonance interferes with the response shapes. An identification method is suggested for eliminating the effect of the antiresonance in order to estimate the ideal open-cavity response. The method is validated and then applied to manubrial and pars-tensa responses. Estimating the ideal open-cavity responses will simplify comparison of the data with numerical models which do not include the air cavity. The data collected at intermediate stages of opening will be useful in validating models that do include the cavity.

Indexed as

VibrationAnimalsEar, MiddleGerbillinaeTympanic Membrane

Identifiers

PMID24452323
PMCPMC4010598
OpenAlexW2060462157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.