Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24452175›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Detection of Campylobacter in stool and determination of significance by culture, enzyme immunoassay, and PCR in developing countries.

James A Platts-Mills, Jie Liu, Jean Gratz, Esto Mduma, Caroline Amour, Ndealilia Swai, Mami Taniuchi, Sharmin Begum, Pablo Peñataro Yori, Drake H Tilley and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Characterization of thermophilicIranian journal of veterinary research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Optimization ofJournal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Quadruplex qPCR for detection and discrimination of C. Coli,C. fetus, and C. Jejuni from other Campylobacter species in chicken and sheep meat.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Capturing clinically relevantMicrobial genomics · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

James A Platts-MillsDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Jie Liu
Jean Gratz
Esto Mduma
Caroline Amour
Ndealilia Swai
Mami Taniuchi
Sharmin Begum
Pablo Peñataro Yori
Drake H Tilley
Gwenyth Lee
Zeli Shen
Mark T Whary
James G Fox
Monica McGrath
Margaret Kosek
Rashidul Haque
Eric R Houpt
University of Virginia · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZPrisma · PEFogarty International Center · USHaydom Lutheran Hospital · TZJohns Hopkins University · USNaval Medical Research Unit Six · PE

Funding

TOXICOLOGY CORE UNITP30ES002109 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LEVINE, STUART S · 1985 to 2020
$25.6M
INFECTIOUS DISEASES TRAINING PROGRAMT32AI007046 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Alison K Criss, William A Petri · 1985 to 2026
$15.3M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007046NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES002109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter is a common bacterial enteropathogen that can be detected in stool by culture, enzyme immunoassay (EIA), or PCR. We compared culture for C. jejuni/C. coli, EIA (ProSpecT), and duplex PCR to distinguish Campylobacter jejuni/C. coli and non-jejuni/coli Campylobacter on 432 diarrheal and matched control stool samples from infants in a multisite longitudinal study of enteric infections in Tanzania, Bangladesh, and Peru. The sensitivity and specificity of culture were 8.5% and 97.6%, respectively, compared with the results of EIA and 8.7% and 98.0%, respectively, compared with the results of PCR for C. jejuni/C. coli. Most (71.6%) EIA-positive samples were positive by PCR for C. jejuni/C. coli, but 27.6% were positive for non-jejuni/coli Campylobacter species. Sequencing of 16S rRNA from 53 of these non-jejuni/coli Campylobacter samples showed that it most closely matched the 16S rRNA of C. hyointestinalis subsp. lawsonii (56%), C. troglodytis (33%), C. upsaliensis (7.7%), and C. jejuni/C. coli (2.6%). Campylobacter-negative stool spiked with each of the above-mentioned Campylobacter species revealed reactivity with EIA. PCR detection of Campylobacter species was strongly associated with diarrhea in Peru (odds ratio [OR] = 3.66, P < 0.001) but not in Tanzania (OR = 1.56, P = 0.24) or Bangladesh (OR = 1.13, P = 0.75). According to PCR, Campylobacter jejuni/C. coli infections represented less than half of all infections with Campylobacter species. In sum, in infants in developing country settings, the ProSpecT EIA and PCR for Campylobacter reveal extremely high rates of positivity. We propose the use of PCR because it retains high sensitivity, can ascertain burden, and can distinguish between Campylobacter infections at the species level.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesBangladeshCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsDeveloping CountriesDiarrheaDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesFemaleHumansInfantMalePeruPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID24452175
PMCPMC3993515
OpenAlexW2005096288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.